On Friday, July 18, 2014 10:05:19 AM UTC-5, j...@cloudflare.com wrote: > I selected 10,000 random JPEGs that we were caching for customers and ran > them through mozjpeg 2.0 via jpegtran. Some interesting facts:
With mozjpeg you probably want to re-encode with cjpeg rather than jpegtran. We added support for JPEG input to cjpeg in mozjpeg to make this possible. I'm not sure, but I don't think jpegtran takes advantage of much of the work we've done to improve compression. > We will continue to work with mozjpeg 2.0 experimentally with the hope that > run time can be brought closer to what we had before as the compression looks > good. We haven't spent as much time as we'd like to on run-time optimization, we've really been focused on compression wins. We hope to spend more time on run-time performance in the future. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
