Re: Too many oranges!

On 22/12/2015 17:40, James Graham wrote: On 22/12/15 17:22, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: FWIW a summary of top orangefactor[1] oranges are posted regularly to dev.tree-alerts. Configuring it to also post to dev.platform is certainly possible if that's what people want. Though I have a feeling that

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

On 29/12/2015 08:51, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: I noticed that the "updated" dictionary has been deleted by its author. There are still two British dictionaries: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/british-english-dictionary/ - Maintainer: Mark Tyndall https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/

How to using js-ctypes to add a function that use JS::Value JS:Object as parameter

For example, I was to use js-ctypes to access the following function: CPOWToString(JSContext* cx, unsigned argc, Value* vp) -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://list

Re: Intent to ship: referrerpolicy attribute

we're working on fixing the web-platform tests but those aren't blocker for shipping this. Neither are the additional valid attribute values, which will be added soon in bug 1178337. So if there are no other concerns we will enable the referrerpolicy attribute in 46. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:15 A

Re: Intent to ship: referrerpolicy attribute

On 2015-12-29 10:42 AM, Franziskus Kiefer wrote: we're working on fixing the web-platform tests but those aren't blocker for shipping this. Neither are the additional valid attribute values, which will be added soon in bug 1178337. So if there are no other concerns we will enable the referrerpoli

Re: Intent to ship: referrerpolicy attribute

On 2015-12-29 12:26 PM, Josh Matthews wrote: On 2015-12-29 10:42 AM, Franziskus Kiefer wrote: we're working on fixing the web-platform tests but those aren't blocker for shipping this. Neither are the additional valid attribute values, which will be added soon in bug 1178337. So if there are no

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

On 2015-12-28 2:31 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: Recently I was browsing some bugs in "Core::Spelling checker" and much to my surprise found four bugs where people complained about wrong or missing words in the en-US dictionary. There were two bugs where people complained about words in the German and

Re: Intent to ship: referrerpolicy attribute

On 2015-12-29 10:42 AM, Franziskus Kiefer wrote: we're working on fixing the web-platform tests but those aren't blocker for shipping this. Neither are the additional valid attribute values, which will be added soon in bug 1178337. So if there are no other concerns we will enable the referrerpoli

Re: Too many oranges!

On 12/22/2015 10:06 AM, L. David Baron wrote: On Tuesday 2015-12-22 11:49 -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 2015-12-22 11:18 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:11 PM, L. David Baron wrote: I agree it's definitely gone up recently, and agree that it causes a lot of wasted time.

Re: Too many oranges!

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Steve Fink wrote: > On 12/22/2015 10:06 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > >> On Tuesday 2015-12-22 11:49 -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: >> >>> On 2015-12-22 11:18 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:11 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > I

Re: Too many oranges!

On 12/29/2015 11:49 AM, Bobby Holley wrote: On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Steve Fink > wrote: On 12/22/2015 10:06 AM, L. David Baron wrote: But I don't think having mozilla-inbound/mozilla-central be closed more than it already is is going to

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

On 29/12/2015 18:23, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: I see no reason for Mozilla to stop maintaining and shipping the en-US dictionary. Agreed. But we should take a different approach. I disagree that the current process is working well since it carries forward legacy errors. I must admit that my origin

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

On 2015-12-28 5:11 PM, Jim Mathies wrote: We could research using native spell checking apis if the platform supports them. For example Windows added spell checking apis in Windows 8. It's not obvious to me why that would be an improvement. The cross-platform nature of our spell checking eng

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

On 2015-12-29 3:34 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: On 29/12/2015 18:23, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: I see no reason for Mozilla to stop maintaining and shipping the en-US dictionary. Agreed. But we should take a different approach. I disagree that the current process is working well since it carries forward

Re: Too many oranges!

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Steve Fink wrote: > On 12/29/2015 11:49 AM, Bobby Holley wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Steve Fink wrote: > >> On 12/22/2015 10:06 AM, L. David Baron wrote: >> >>> But I don't think having mozilla-inbound/mozilla-central be closed >>> more than

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

Le 29/12/2015 18:23, Ehsan Akhgari a écrit : On 2015-12-28 2:31 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: Recently I was browsing some bugs in "Core::Spelling checker" and much to my surprise found four bugs where people complained about wrong or missing words in the en-US dictionary. There were two bugs where p

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:23:05PM -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2015-12-28 2:31 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: > >Recently I was browsing some bugs in "Core::Spelling checker" and much > >to my surprise found four bugs where people complained about wrong or > >missing words in the en-US dictionary. T

Re: Too many oranges!

More to the point, I don't think that doing this is "a big hammer [that] should be used sparingly." Getting paid to work on Mozilla stuff is a huge privilege, and that privilege comes with the duty to work on what the organization thinks is most important. The fact that it's often most prac

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

On 29/12/2015 21:54, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: They are not Mozilla special words. They are words that we want to add to our spell checking dictionary that don't exist in the upstream SCOWL word list. In bug 1235506 I suggest to maintain three lists: 1) proper names of which we have about 12.000. 2)

Re: Maintaining the en-US dictionary that ships with Mozilla products

On 2015-12-29 6:54 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: On 29/12/2015 21:54, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: They are not Mozilla special words. They are words that we want to add to our spell checking dictionary that don't exist in the upstream SCOWL word list. In bug 1235506 I suggest to maintain three lists: 1) p