On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:23:05PM -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2015-12-28 2:31 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote:
> >Recently I was browsing some bugs in "Core::Spelling checker" and much
> >to my surprise found four bugs where people complained about wrong or
> >missing words in the en-US dictionary. There were two bugs where people
> >complained about words in the German and the French dictionaries.
> >
> >The German and French bugs were finally closed as "wontfix" and
> >"invalid" and referred back to the respective dictionary maintainers.
> >For French there is a very good a approach: The French dictionaries are
> >maintained via this site: http://www.dicollecte.org/ and imported for
> >distribution with the French version of Firefox. The situation for
> >German is not as good, but there is a maintainer whose work is then
> >turned into an add-on (in fact, sadly, two competing ones).
> 
> As you have discovered, we don't ship any non-en-US dictionaries with
> Firefox, so the above is off topic for this mailing list.
> 
> >I was extremely surprised that Mozilla maintains a version of the en-US
> >dictionary, and you can see the movements here:
> >https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/log/tip/extensions/spellcheck/locales/en-US/hunspell/en-US.dic
> >
> >
> >Basically Ekanan Ketunuti does merges from upstream providers (SCOWL)
> >but also adds words individually and Ehsan reviews each change.
> 
> That's incorrect.  I periodically merge from SCOWL, and Ekanan regularly
> submits patches for words missing from SCOWL (and our en-US dictionary.)

Note that was true for a very long time. The regular merges from SCOWL
are fairly recent.

Mike
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to