On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> If Thunderbird still wants to have these, I think they should take
> them into comm-central.
This bit was buried in the large email, so let's highlight it separately.
Do Thunderbird developers want to keep decoders that are going away
from
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Nicholas Cameron wrote:
> In the long term, OMTC basic layers will be the default for Linux and
> forcing HWA will give OpenGL OMTC as expected.
Do I understand correctly that all these users will get OMTC basic
layers as the long-term solution?
* Don't have 3D dr
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
> What do we gain by having results that can't be trusted?
The same that we gain from allowing any try pushes that don't run
every single test. It's a tradeoff between reliability and time, not
black-and-white. For instance, if I change a
Do we still really need the legacy Mac encodings and JOHAB in order to
make sense of fonts?
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/gfx/thebes/gfxFontUtils.cpp#1139
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
http://hsivonen.fi/
___
dev-platform mailing
Nicholas Cameron writes:
> Currently on Linux our only 'supported' graphics backend is the
> main-thread software backend (basic layers).
FWIW basic layers is predominantly GPU-based compositing
(not-softwared) on most X11 systems.
> 5) We would love to spend time making OMTC OpenGL on Linux wor
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> Nicholas Cameron writes:
>
>> Currently on Linux our only 'supported' graphics backend is the
>> main-thread software backend (basic layers).
>
> FWIW basic layers is predominantly GPU-based compositing
> (not-softwared) on most X11 systems.
Andreas Gal writes:
> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take
> contributed patches, and people are welcome to fix issues they
> see, as long its not at the expense of the things that matter.
Do bugs in B2G Desktop on Linux/X11 matter?
I assume glitches and perf issues that are
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> Andreas Gal writes:
>
>> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take
>> contributed patches, and people are welcome to fix issues they
>> see, as long its not at the expense of the things that matter.
>
> Do bugs in B2G Desktop
Andreas Gal writes:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
>
>> Andreas Gal writes:
>>
>>> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take
>>> contributed patches, and people are welcome to fix issues they
>>> see, as long its not at the expense of the things that matter.
(Not replying to anyone in particular, just replying to the lastest email
in this thread at this point: ) Let's not transform the original
conversation here, which was purely a technical conversation about
improving the way we do compositing on Linux, into a prioritization
conversation, which would
On Thursday 2013-11-07 14:13 +0200, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
> > I'm just afraid we're going to end up in the same situation we're already in
> > with intermittent failures where the developer looks at it and says "that
> > couldn't possibly be
On Thursday 2013-11-07 13:24 -0800, Andreas Gal wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> > Will any MoCo developers be permitted to spend some time fixing
> > these or the already-known issues?
>
> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take contributed
> patche
Nicholas Cameron schrieb:
Our goal is (basically) to be OMTC everywhere
I have been using OMTC on Linux for a while (with both prefs on,
actually) and with the exception of
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934250 everything works
really fine (but then, I'm on the newest kernel/d
On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:06 PM, "L. David Baron" wrote:
> On Thursday 2013-11-07 13:24 -0800, Andreas Gal wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
>>> Will any MoCo developers be permitted to spend some time fixing
>>> these or the already-known issues?
>>
>> Its not a priority
Andreas Gal writes:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:06 PM, "L. David Baron" wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 2013-11-07 13:24 -0800, Andreas Gal wrote:
>>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
Will any MoCo developers be permitted to spend some time fixing
these or the already-known issues?
On 11/7/2013 5:42 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Do Thunderbird developers want to keep decoders that are going away
from Firefox? These include:
I don't think any Thunderbird developer is well-informed on the issue of
charsets in email. The only non-web charset I know we need is the IMAP
modified UT
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
>
> - Finish fixing the devtools leaks:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=932880.
Fixed on mozilla-central and backported to aurora, beta, and
b2g26_v1_2. Nothing more to do.
> - Finish fixing the social API leaks:
> https
17 matches
Mail list logo
