Andreas Gal writes: > On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Karl Tomlinson <mozn...@karlt.net> wrote: > >> Andreas Gal writes: >> >>> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take >>> contributed patches, and people are welcome to fix issues they >>> see, as long its not at the expense of the things that matter. >> >> Do bugs in B2G Desktop on Linux/X11 matter? >> >> I assume glitches and perf issues that are not on the device >> don't really matter. How about crashes and security bugs? > > Nobody said Linux/X11 doesn't matter. The proposal was to focus > on OMTC on all platforms, including Linux/X11.
I assume games and maps and WebGL matter. The current direction for WebGL on Linux/X11 seems to be assuming that OGL will be the solution. The comments thus far in this thread imply that OGL-OMTC-Linux-X11 doesn't matter. If that is the case, then we need to find another solution for WebGL. However, OGL-OMTC layers is likely the best solution for WebGL, and not necessarily more work. And if OGL-OMTC-Linux-X11 doesn't matter for Firefox, then how much is B2G Desktop used on Linux? Even if only crashes on Linux B2G Desktop matter, then OGL-OMTC-Linux-X11 Firefox will benefit from sharing the same code, and benefits flow the other way too. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
