On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 10:08:27 AM UTC-4, William Lachance wrote:
> On 2019-04-09 11:00 a.m., Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
> > On 5/04/19 15:35,jma...@mozilla.com wrote:
> >> Currently linux32 makes up about .77% of our total users. This is
> >> still 1M+ users on any given week.
> > I aske
On 2019-04-09 11:00 a.m., Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
On 5/04/19 15:35,jma...@mozilla.com wrote:
Currently linux32 makes up about .77% of our total users. This is
still 1M+ users on any given week.
I asked jmaher what percentage of our Linux users this is. It's 21%.
This doesn't seem small.
O
Thanks everyone for your comments.
If we were to run linux32 tests in whole on mozilla-central only that would
result in about half of the load we see from linux32 today and about 1
backfill a week (given that most unique linux32 regressions result in test
disabling). That alone would be a good s
I'd like to refocus this thread a bit around Jed's question, because it
gets to the core of the issue.
The proposal argues that test results for linux32 closely track those for
linux64, and that this duplication is expensive. If that's the only
problem, we could solve it by keeping linux32 as a ti
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:05 PM Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
> On top of that, we know that not all distros have telemetry enabled and
> so we won't be counting those either (Debian is the largest).
We get telemetry from Ubuntu, Fedora, and Arch (subject to choices
made by the user). I'm not partic
-- Original Message --
From: "Gian-Carlo Pascutto"
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: 2019-04-09 11:00:14 AM
Subject: Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox
69
On 5/04/19 15:35, jma...@mozilla.com wrote:
Currently linux32 makes up about .
On 5/04/19 15:35, jma...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Currently linux32 makes up about .77% of our total users. This is
> still 1M+ users on any given week.
I asked jmaher what percentage of our Linux users this is. It's 21%.
This doesn't seem small.
On top of that, we know that not all distros have tel
jma...@mozilla.com writes:
> As our next ESR is upcoming, I would like to turn off linux32 on
> Firefox 69 and let it ride the trains and stay on 68 ESR. This will
> allow builds/tests to be supported with security updates into 2021.
Does this mean that Linux on 32-bit x86 is being demoted to Ti
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:45 AM Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
> On 4/5/19 10:20 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
> > If we can drop that then we can remove a bunch of complexity
> > and code paths.
>
> Are we talking about just dropping linux32 _tests_, or dropping linux32
> _support_?
Tests.
> Because if we
On 4/5/19 10:20 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
If we can drop that then we can remove a bunch of complexity
and code paths.
Are we talking about just dropping linux32 _tests_, or dropping linux32
_support_?
Because if we're keeping support, and linux32 is the only non-APZ
confiration, then not
I would be happy to see Linux32 (and in particular, desktop non-e10s) tests
decommissioned, as that is pretty much the only configuration with APZ
disabled now. If we can drop that then we can remove a bunch of complexity
and code paths.
On Fri., Apr. 5, 2019, 10:05 Boris Zbarsky, wrote:
> On 4/
On 4/5/19 9:35 AM, jma...@mozilla.com wrote:
As our next ESR is upcoming, I would like to turn off linux32 on Firefox 69 and
let it ride the trains and stay on 68 ESR. This will allow builds/tests to be
supported with security updates into 2021.
The only thing I've used the linux32 tests for
Currently linux32 makes up about .77% of our total users. This is still 1M+
users on any given week.
There is not a lot of support in the industry for 32 bit linux, all the major
vendors are only distributing 64 bit versions now and other browser vendors
only distribute 64 bit versions officia
13 matches
Mail list logo
