+1
-Bryan
> On Jun 18, 2018, at 8:06 AM, David Calavera wrote:
>
> I noticed that atscppapi::RegisterGlobalPlugin doesn't return any value.
> This makes impossible for plugins that use to to know whether they need to
> abort initialization or continue after registering
com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I noticed that atscppapi::RegisterGlobalPlugin doesn't return any
> value.
> > > This makes impossible for plugins that use to to know whether they need
> > to
> > > abort initialization or continue after registe
+1
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Alan Carroll <
solidwallofc...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:06 AM, David Calavera >
> wrote:
>
> > I noticed that atscppapi::RegisterGlobalPlugin doesn't return any value.
> > This ma
+1
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:06 AM, David Calavera
wrote:
> I noticed that atscppapi::RegisterGlobalPlugin doesn't return any value.
> This makes impossible for plugins that use to to know whether they need to
> abort initialization or continue after registering the plugin.
>
I noticed that atscppapi::RegisterGlobalPlugin doesn't return any value.
This makes impossible for plugins that use to to know whether they need to
abort initialization or continue after registering the plugin.
I'm proposing to change the method signature to return a boolean value, so
p
blic AsyncProvider
> {
> ...
> }
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Dk Jack wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> In the file lib/atscppapi/examples/async_http_fetch/AsyncHttpFetch.cc,
>> there is this code:
>>
>> --
provider automatically
> * self-destructs after the completion of the request.
> *
> * See example async_http_fetch{,_streaming} for sample usage.
> */
> class AsyncHttpFetch : public AsyncProvider
> {
> ...
> }
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Dk Jack wrote:
>&
omatically
* self-destructs after the completion of the request.
*
* See example async_http_fetch{,_streaming} for sample usage.
*/
class AsyncHttpFetch : public AsyncProvider
{
...
}
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Dk Jack wrote:
> Hi,
> In the file lib/atscppapi/examples/
Hi,
In the file lib/atscppapi/examples/async_http_fetch/AsyncHttpFetch.cc,
there is this code:
---
// we'll add some custom headers for this request
AsyncHttpFetch2 *provider2
1) I would expect some changes in the CPP API but it will remain compile
compatible during a major version. It is used in production in multiple
deployments.
2) I am unfortunately not familiar with the TransformPlugin class.
3) Your changes seem sensible. Certainly it is a thing that's been done
Hi,
I have been investigating this API (primarily the transformation class) to see
whether it could be used rather than the lower level functions.
I have a few questions.
1. Is this API ready for production use? I.e. is it still being updated
regularly and will the interface change?
2.
Alan,
I have web-server behind ats. I was trying print various request attributes in
my plugin.
curl -v showed that it's sending the correct headers. I even collected tcpdump
of the exchange and I see the complete URL being sent. The host header has the
correct info. When I use the getHost API
curl --proxy localhost:8080 http://trafficserver.apache.org
Thank you, helpful mail program.
I'm not sure what you're trying to do with that curl command. ATS is a proxy
which means it has no content, it expects to forward any request on to an
origin server. What origin server are you trying to reach via ATS? Normally I
would do something like
curl --proxy localhost:8080 Apache Traffic
Hi,
I am using atscppapi in my plugin. I send a curl request as follows to ATS:
curl 'http://localhost:8080/abcdef?a=1&b=2'
In my plugin code, in handleReadRequestHeadersPreRemap function, I am
printing the following:
logInfo("effective-url: %s", txn
> On May 6, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Akbar Said wrote:
>
> Figured out that you need to: ./configure --enable-cppapi when
> configuring the trafficserver build.
>
> But still the question remains, is using atscppapi lib to develop plugins
> the way of the future?
It’s an a
Figured out that you need to: ./configure --enable-cppapi when
configuring the trafficserver build.
But still the question remains, is using atscppapi lib to develop plugins
the way of the future?
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Akbar Said wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just wanted to
Hi folks,
Just wanted to check, is using atscppapi a current or "future" way of
coding plugins in trafficserver? If so, is there a proper documentation for
that?
I am sure one can still do it by reading the example code, and
understanding the API classes. But I couldn't find an
9, 2016 12:43 PM, Dk Jack wrote:
Hi,
I am using atscppapi in my plugin. Specifically, I am using AsyncHttpFetch
api.
When I use the AsyncHttpFetch with a regular url say like '
http://www.foo.com:/' it works.
However, if I use the fetch api with a url that includes query args i
nc.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Can you check your remap rule? Perhaps, you may need to add trailing / in
>> the source URL in the remap rule.
>> Thanks,
>> Sudheer
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 12:43 PM, Dk Jack
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>
e remap rule.
> Thanks,
> Sudheer
>
> On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 12:43 PM, Dk Jack
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I am using atscppapi in my plugin. Specifically, I am using AsyncHttpFetch
> api.
> When I use the AsyncHttpFetch with a regular url say like '
> ht
Can you check your remap rule? Perhaps, you may need to add trailing / in the
source URL in the remap rule.
Thanks,
Sudheer
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 12:43 PM, Dk Jack wrote:
Hi,
I am using atscppapi in my plugin. Specifically, I am using AsyncHttpFetch
api.
When I use the
Hi,
I am using atscppapi in my plugin. Specifically, I am using AsyncHttpFetch
api.
When I use the AsyncHttpFetch with a regular url say like '
http://www.foo.com:/' it works.
However, if I use the fetch api with a url that includes query args i.e. '
http://www.foo.com:/
Hi,
Im a bit new to TS and TS plugin development, so I started writing one
using the ATSCPPAPI
I am trying to get the total Req/Resp Hdr/Bdy bite sizes using
the transaction.getClientResponseHeaderSize() and getClientResponseBodySize
respectively. I placed it in the latest CPP transaction hook
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/345
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user bgaff opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/345
TS-4034: Minor atscppapi cleanup
A few things should be cleaned up in atscppapi.
- CaseInsensitiveStringComparitor isn't used internally but it is exposed
in a public API, so be
Github user canselcik closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/344
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user canselcik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/344#issuecomment-158515997
Sounds good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user bgaff commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/344#issuecomment-158515283
I already have these changes locally that I'm about to commit you can close
this pull request
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user canselcik opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/344
Refactoring of atscppapi code
@bgaff
Removing `CaseInsensitiveStringComparator` class from `atscppapi` as it can
be replaced with and is not used in the codebase at all
in atscppapi::InterceptPlugin::handleEvent
(this=0x2b60cc061b10, abstract_event=103, edata=0x2b60cc90ac80) at
InterceptPlugin.cc:299*
*event = TS_EVENT_VCONN_WRITE_COMPLETE*
*__FUNCTION__ = "handleEvent"*
*#4 0x2b60b7bede50 in
atscppapi::utils::internal::dispatchInte
Brian,
Yes it makes perfect sense. But when I saw the virtual run() l I thought I
might me missing something.
Getter will do the trick. For now I will implement my own.
Sandeep.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Brian Geffon
wrote:
> Unfortunately you cannot access the state_ member because it
Unfortunately you cannot access the state_ member because it's private in
AsyncHttpFetch, I think the best option here might be for us to add a
getter method for the dispatch controller. Alternatively, you can just skip
inheriting from AsyncHttpFetch and implement the AsyncProvider interface
and co
I want to extend AsyncHttpFetch class to have my own run implementation.
How can we set "state_->dispatch_controller_" for a derived class of
AsyncHttpFetch.
Sandeep.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/77
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user manjeshnilange opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/77
fix for TS-2779 (atscppapi: bug in AsyncTimer - cancel results in crash)
The fix is that in cancel() we remember this fact and use it to check
cancel retry.
You can merge this pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/76
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user manjeshnilange opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/76
atscppapi: fix for TS-2777 - using content length from correct header
Previously, the intercept code was looking for the Content Length header in
the data sent by the client. However
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/73
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user manjeshnilange opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/73
patch for TS-2720 atscppapi: Request transformation streaming doesn't work
Patch buffers the output till setOutputComplete() is called.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user manjeshnilange closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/71
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
GitHub user manjeshnilange opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/71
patch for TS-2719 - atscppapi: Check for error state in intercept
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/manjeshnilange
- Original Message -
> Repository: trafficserver
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master f347b0ddd -> 0521f07be
>
>
> [TS-2688] atscppapi: new exmaple plugin Boom
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/repo
> Commit: h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/64
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user manjeshnilange opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/64
atscppapi: fixes for TS-2651: race conditions in destruction of ...
...async providers.
Also, I noticed a duplicated lock while invoking an intercept plugin.
Though the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/62
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user manjeshnilange opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/62
atscppapi: Bug fixes in headers and atscppapi
As discussed - there is now a wireStr() in Headers and I'm fixing a couple
of bugs in intercept.
You can merge this pull request i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/60
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user manjeshnilange opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/60
atscppapi: Locking fix in xform and utility macro for logging
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/manjeshnilange
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/58
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user manjeshnilange opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/58
atscppapi: Added missing intercept files
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/manjeshnilange/trafficserver master
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/56
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
We should have a JIRA ticket for this so that we can publish accurate change
logs and release notes
On Mar 6, 2014, at 12:47 PM, bri...@apache.org wrote:
> intercept support in atscppapi
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/repo
> Commit:
On Oct 29, 2013, at 3:03 PM, bri...@apache.org wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master e0e64ba62 -> 086906ae3
>
>
> Cleaning up build of atscppapi
>
[snip]
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/blob/086906ae/lib/atscppapi/examples/asyn
he coming weeks feel free to get started
> now and I can help you as you go.
>
> Brian
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Shu Kit Chan
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am experimenting to rewrite esi plugin using only atscppapi.
> >
ree to get started
now and I can help you as you go.
Brian
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Shu Kit Chan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experimenting to rewrite esi plugin using only atscppapi.
> First bit of feedback - I need to do transformation on response after the
> cache_lookup_co
Hi,
I am experimenting to rewrite esi plugin using only atscppapi.
First bit of feedback - I need to do transformation on response after the
cache_lookup_complete hook. But it isn't available in the api.
I look up the source and it should be pretty easy to add it myself. So i
think i can s
57 matches
Mail list logo
