Brian, Yes it makes perfect sense. But when I saw the virtual run() l I thought I might me missing something. Getter will do the trick. For now I will implement my own.
Sandeep. On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Brian Geffon <briangef...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately you cannot access the state_ member because it's private in > AsyncHttpFetch, I think the best option here might be for us to add a > getter method for the dispatch controller. Alternatively, you can just skip > inheriting from AsyncHttpFetch and implement the AsyncProvider interface > and copy the code from AsyncHttpFetch over where applicable. Does that make > sense? > > Brian > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Sandeep Davu <sandeep.d...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I want to extend AsyncHttpFetch class to have my own run implementation. > > > > How can we set "state_->dispatch_controller_" for a derived class of > > AsyncHttpFetch. > > > > > > Sandeep. > > >
