On Sat, 23 May 2009 22:15:56 -0400
Kris Maglione wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started writing a new guide/reference for wmii. It's in hg
> under doc/wmii.pdf. Unfortunately, my usual proof readers think
> it's written in Greek, so I'd appreciate any comments,
> suggestions, or corrections from anyon
Hi
In section 2.1.1, "Press (M-space) ... (M-return) ...", M should be
Meta key (the windoze key), but on a fresh install of wmii-hg, it's the
Alt key which has to be used (on my system at leat), it's a bit
confusing...
I continue with the reading, thanks for this guide.
Pascal
Hello,
since the last checkouts on wmii-hg i got the following complile errors:
make deb
CC cmd/wmii9menu.o
In file included from cmd/wmii9menu.c:49:
../include/x11.h:9:25: error: X11/Xft/Xft.h: No such file or directory
In file included from cmd/wmii9menu.c:49:
../include/x11.h:92: error: expect
Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are merged I
get bunch of wmii related ones and frankly I don't need them at all.
Thanks.
Now wmii support Xft, so you probably need to install libxft-dev.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Pampel
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since the last checkouts on wmii-hg i got the following complile errors:
> make deb
>
> CC cmd/wmii9menu.o
> In file included from cmd/wmii9menu.c:49:
> ../includ
* yy [2008-11-04 17:13:01 +0100]:
> >> I could do it. I can submit it today or tomorrow, but then I think wmu
> >> should be included in the hg repository (the script could go inside
> >> the tarball). This is up to Anselm, of course.
[...]
> There are 2 possible solutions:
> 1. Include the scr
I'd like to know this too. I would only like dwm ones like the lists used
to be.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan wrote:
> Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are merged I
> get bunch of wmii related ones and frankly I don't need them at all.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
Hi,
Stefan Pampel :
> Hello,
>
> since the last checkouts on wmii-hg i got the following complile errors:
> make deb
>
> CC cmd/wmii9menu.o
> In file included from cmd/wmii9menu.c:49:
> ../include/x11.h:9:25: error: X11/Xft/Xft.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from cmd/wmii9menu.c:
Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner wrote:
> I'd like to know this too. I would only like dwm ones like the lists used
> to be.
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to get only dwm
>
> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
That's a great idea!
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin wrote:
> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
>
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner
> wrote:
> > I'd like to know t
Stop whining, the dwm list had tons of non-dwm chatter, if you are not
interested in one thread, press the delete button.
uriel
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Benjamin Conner wrote:
>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
>
> That's a great idea!
>
> On Sun, May 2
WTF? They claim to follow 'the unix way', and they write *bash*
scripts? Are this people retarded? And thy use
--idiotic-gnu-style-options *YUCK*
uriel
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> I like the main ideas (minimalism/vi(m) key bindings).
> But the poor quality of the sh
ok. I guess that's fine. Maybe I'll just make another email adress for the
lists so it doesn't fill up my personal inbox.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Uriel wrote:
> Stop whining, the dwm list had tons of non-dwm chatter, if you are not
> interested in one thread, press the delete button.
Ever heard of procmail?
uriel
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Benjamin Conner wrote:
> ok. I guess that's fine. Maybe I'll just make another email adress for the
> lists so it doesn't fill up my personal inbox.
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Uriel wrote:
>>
>> Stop whining, the dwm li
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Uriel wrote:
> WTF? They claim to follow 'the unix way', and they write *bash*
> scripts? Are this people retarded? And thy use
> --idiotic-gnu-style-options *YUCK*
I agree, one of the projects motto is "the Unix way", yet I still
need a borked shell and bloated l
NCURSES?! LIBCACA?! You're absolutely insane!
Only because it's terminal based makes the libraries not better.
GTK is the least sucking way (anyway not a good one) to use Webkit. If
you want to use a textbrowser use elinks.
I think uzbl is a good base to write a better browser, but I believe
gtk
Uriel this is not 9fans, please send your stupid commets to another list.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Uriel wrote:
> Stop whining, the dwm list had tons of non-dwm chatter, if you are not
> interested in one thread, press the delete button.
>
> uriel
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Benj
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
> GTK is the least sucking way (anyway not a good one) to use Webkit. If
> you want to use a textbrowser use elinks.
If you think by using libcaca I'll have a "textbrowser" like elinks then
you are wrong.
Uzbl is ok for a minimal codeb
Other than ad hominems, do you have any evidence that my statement
regarding the amount of non-dwm related traffic in the dwm@ list is
untrue?
Thank you
uriel
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM, pmarin wrote:
> Uriel this is not 9fans, please send your stupid commets to another list.
>
> On Sun, M
The problem, I think, is that a dwm user doesn't care about wmii stuff
and probably wmii users feel the same about dwm. The no-dwm stuff in
dwm list is about other suckless stuff but not wmii becouse already we
have chosen the wm to use.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Uriel wrote:
> Other than
I use w3m as primary browser and firefox only for sites that need
javascript or ajax. I cannot see this project suckless, it only uses
a bloated rendering engine and lack needed functions. I think one can
take midori and remove some functions to make yet another uzbl. It
will earn more respect b
On Sun, 24 May 2009, pmarin wrote:
> The problem, I think, is that a dwm user doesn't care about wmii stuff
> and probably wmii users feel the same about dwm. The no-dwm stuff in
> dwm list is about other suckless stuff but not wmii becouse already we
> have chosen the wm to use.
I suppose I did n
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Uriel wrote:
> Other than ad hominems, [...]
This from the person whose inital contribution to this topic started
with "Stop whining". :-)
Gentlemen, different people will have different opinions of what
consitutes "chatter" and "stupid". Furthermore, not everyo
On (24/05/09 23:30), bill lam wrote:
> To: dev@suckless.org
> From: bill lam
> Subject: Re: [dev] dwm only?
> Mail-Followup-To: dev@suckless.org
> Reply-To: dev mail list
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-04-29)
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2009, pmarin wrote:
> > The problem, I th
Sorry but you are not right, not to mention rude response. Dwm list has
plenty of _interesting_ topics related to dwm or any other minimal
suckless project. It is fantastic way to get informed about other
minimal projects and better ways to do something. Wmii is bloatware for
me or at least topic t
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 04:43:31PM +0200, Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
> NCURSES?! LIBCACA?! You're absolutely insane!
> Only because it's terminal based makes the libraries not better.
>
> GTK is the least sucking way (anyway not a good one) to use Webkit. If
> you want to use a textbrowser use el
I don't necessarily agree with Uriel's solution but your tone is no less
rude and point no more correct. The wmii mailing list was a mailing list
for wmii, the dwm mailing list was a mailing list for dwm, NEITHER of
them were the Slashdot RSS feed. Regardless of how "interesting" you
thought the to
On Sun, 24 May 2009 18:11:37 +0200
Leonardo Taccari wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 04:43:31PM +0200, Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
> > NCURSES?! LIBCACA?! You're absolutely insane!
> > Only because it's terminal based makes the libraries not better.
> >
> > GTK is the least sucking way (anyway n
Did I missed something?!
'dwm only?' subject is about splitting lists or getting things
reverted or whatever you call it, I am not that informed about mailing
list options and that's best I could do to define what I would like to
see. If there is better way to phrase what I already stated and bett
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> About the gtk dependency -> http://www.uzbl.org/faq.php
The GTK dependency is understendable for a graphical browser.
All we can regret is that it comes with glib (but as it's here, it's
normal to use it in a gtk app).
> About the other c
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> mind telling us which functionality is lacking?
Those that you wrote in this thread.
> Btw, did you notice the project is just a month old and we have
> no release yet?
>
> About the gtk dependency -> http://www.uzbl.org/faq.php
not gtk dependency
>
> > > Sorry but you are not right, not to mention rude response. Dwm list
> > > has plenty of _interesting_ topics related to dwm or any other
> > > minimal suckless project. It is fantastic way to get informed about
> > > other minimal projects and better ways to do something. Wmii is
> > > bloa
> Did I missed something?!
>
> 'dwm only?' subject is about splitting lists or getting things
> reverted or whatever you call it, I am not that informed about mailing
> list options and that's best I could do to define what I would like to
> see. If there is better way to phrase what I already stat
> Seriously people, can't you just listen to it and not correct it? I hate
> when people do that in real life too.
I wasn't trying to correct anything. I was suggesting the creation of a
new topic with an obvious name so that if the list owners weren't
following this topic the new name would catc
What was wrong with the pre-dev approach?
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Thomas Gallen wrote:
>> Seriously people, can't you just listen to it and not correct it? I hate
>> when people do that in real life too.
>
> I wasn't trying to correct anything. I was suggesting the creation of a
> new t
A lack of separation of on and off topic posts was probably probably
happening then as well, it just so happened that the people in the dwm
list didn't mind it. Reverting to pre-dev or a 3 list system would
probably both have a similar result. So I guess the idea being discussed
is "where to from h
>
> > I wasn't trying to correct anything. I was suggesting the creation of a
> > new topic with an obvious name so that if the list owners weren't
> > following this topic the new name would catch their attention.
>
Ok, that makes sense.
> > I completely agree. Mixing the two lists has definitely
>
> A lack of separation of on and off topic posts was probably probably
> happening then as well, it just so happened that the people in the dwm
> list didn't mind it. Reverting to pre-dev or a 3 list system would
> probably both have a similar result. So I guess the idea being discussed
> is "whe
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Dusan wrote:
> Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are merged I
> get bunch of wmii related ones and frankly I don't need them at all.
>
> Thanks.
If your email client has the capability, you should be able to create
a filter which trashes e
On Sun 24 May 2009 at 09:11:37 PDT Leonardo Taccari wrote:
I agree with you Enno, I think that uzbl can became a very interesting
browser because it's trying to follow the Unix way and at the same time
its rendering, thanks to Webkit, isn't bad.
I haven't had a chance to try uzbl yet, but I agr
[2009-05-24 11:31] Charlie Kester
>
> Writing an html renderer is not a simple task, so I understand the
> decision to use an existing one (webkit) rather than set out to write a
> new, suckless one.
If this is possible at all. The current web technology requires
complex software to render the p
Jacob Todd wrote:
> Has anyone tried out uzbl (http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, it would
> be nice to replace firefox with this. I plan on installing it on my
> gentoo system later today.
>
I have tried it already, and found very nasty thing about native
language handling (filed bug already),
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:47:40PM +0400, Michael wrote:
> Although concept of one page per instance isn't very useful for me right
> now. I use dwm, and I want web page be full screen, but if I'm not in
> monocle mode, pages get shrunk in a half if there is more than one page,
> which is bad, and
* Michael [2009-05-24 21:55]:
> Although concept of one page per instance isn't very useful for me right
> now. I use dwm, and I want web page be full screen, but if I'm not in
> monocle mode, pages get shrunk in a half if there is more than one page,
> which is bad, and monocle mode isn't useful
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Michael wrote:
> Jacob Todd wrote:
>> Has anyone tried out uzbl (http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, it would
>> be nice to replace firefox with this. I plan on installing it on my
>> gentoo system later today.
>>
>
> I have tried it already, and found very nasty
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:38 PM, wrote:
> * Michael [2009-05-24 21:55]:
>> Although concept of one page per instance isn't very useful for me right
>> now. I use dwm, and I want web page be full screen, but if I'm not in
>> monocle mode, pages get shrunk in a half if there is more than one page
sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> * Michael [2009-05-24 21:55]:
> > Although concept of one page per instance isn't very useful for me right
> > now. I use dwm, and I want web page be full screen, but if I'm not in
> > monocle mode, pages get shrunk in a half if there is more than one page,
> > whic
nilp wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:47:40PM +0400, Michael wrote:
> > Although concept of one page per instance isn't very useful for me right
> > now. I use dwm, and I want web page be full screen, but if I'm not in
> > monocle mode, pages get shrunk in a half if there is more than one page,
You know, if people stopped complaining or responding to complaints there
would be a lot less chatter on the list
Jeremy
On Sun 24 May 2009 - 11:12AM, Thayer Williams wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Dusan wrote:
> > Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are mer
It took me all of 10 seconds to create new rules for this list. And it's not
exactly a high traffic list.
2009/5/25 Jeremy Jay
> You know, if people stopped complaining or responding to complaints there
> would be a lot less chatter on the list
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Sun 24 May 2009 - 11:12AM, Th
The whole tabbing situation could be solved if monacle were able to
function for only one tab (or "virtual desktop" if you will).
If that can happen, then simply having moncale on the tab you have the
browser in would be great. if you want to go to another open page you
just shuffle around till yo
Hi,
Any plan to add real grow/nudge example?
Thanks,
Pertag patch (http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/pertag) has this licked.
I use it, and it works fine!
Don
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:05:44PM -0400, Ammar James wrote to To dev mail list:
> The whole tabbing situation could be solved if monacle were able to
> function for only one tab (or "virtual d
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:51:59AM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote:
> > Hi, I tried to make all of R[www.r-project.org] relative stuffs, like graph
> > it
> > produces by graphic device x11(), floating, the method I've tried are:
> >
> > { NULL, "R",N
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:51:59AM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote:
> > > Hi, I tried to make all of R[www.r-project.org] relative stuffs, like
> > > graph it
> > > produces by graphic device x11(), floating, the method I've tried
56 matches
Mail list logo
