The problem, I think, is that a dwm user doesn't care about wmii stuff and probably wmii users feel the same about dwm. The no-dwm stuff in dwm list is about other suckless stuff but not wmii becouse already we have chosen the wm to use.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Uriel <lost.gob...@gmail.com> wrote: > Other than ad hominems, do you have any evidence that my statement > regarding the amount of non-dwm related traffic in the dwm@ list is > untrue? > > Thank you > > uriel > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM, pmarin <pacog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Uriel this is not 9fans, please send your stupid commets to another list. >> >> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Uriel <lost.gob...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Stop whining, the dwm list had tons of non-dwm chatter, if you are not >>> interested in one thread, press the delete button. >>> >>> uriel >>> >>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Benjamin Conner <tommydabo...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list? >>>> >>>> That's a great idea! >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin <pacog...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner <tommydabo...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > I'd like to know this too. I would only like dwm ones like the lists >>>>> > used >>>>> > to be. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan <ef_...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are merged I >>>>> >> get bunch of wmii related ones and frankly I don't need them at all. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
