On (24/05/09 23:30), bill lam wrote: > To: dev@suckless.org > From: bill lam <cbill....@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [dev] dwm only? > Mail-Followup-To: dev@suckless.org > Reply-To: dev mail list <dev@suckless.org> > List-Id: dev mail list <dev.suckless.org> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-04-29) > > On Sun, 24 May 2009, pmarin wrote: > > The problem, I think, is that a dwm user doesn't care about wmii stuff > > and probably wmii users feel the same about dwm. The no-dwm stuff in > > dwm list is about other suckless stuff but not wmii becouse already we > > have chosen the wm to use. > > I suppose I did not care for the merge because I thought that wmii > mailing list was already dormant then. > >
It is! It's just that after merge, wmii's part become abnormally active. :-) -Ph -- Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/ - I'm a signature virus. Please add me to your signature and help me spread!