On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 07:28:13AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Google Summer of Code is on for 2010 [1]. Is there any interest in
> > participating this year? If so, I've found that the mentoring
> > application deadline
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:27:30PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> If I was correct about 12 march beeing the deadline for organisationz to
> apply for GSoC, it's four days left today.
>
> I hope noone thinks I'm too pushy about this. Just wanted to rule out
> the risk of us missing the last date (
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 21:34 +, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Mon Mar 8 21:34:38 2010
> New Revision: 920526
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920526&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
> (install_added_props): Remove call to svn_wc__db_ba
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 9 maart 2010 11:15
> To: rhuij...@apache.org; dev@subversion.apache.org;
> comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r920526 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor
Julian Foad writes:
>> +/* The absolute destination's parent path */
>> +const char *dst_parent_abspath;
>
> "The absolute path or URL of the destination's parent" ?
Yes. Tweaked.
--
Philip
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:55 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Paul Burba wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> Do you recall what version of Subversion you used to do the
>> REVISIONIST HISTORY work
>> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/README)?
>>
>> I'm assuming it was probably 1.6.6, which was the curre
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Does this mean that we don't have to do anything special to apply
> for Gsoc, but just apply for slots within ASF when the time comes?
Yup - you just apply internally.
I believe someone from SVN should subscribe to
d...@community.apache.or
> -Original Message-
> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 9 maart 2010 13:30
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r920839 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Mar 9 12:29:58 2010
>
Revisions 920521 and later fail some tests for me.
The first test program in 'make check' that fails is
'checkout_tests.py'. After that quite a few fail, including
commit_tests.py and copy_tests.py.
I'm letting make check run to completion now for current head (r920875)
and I'll post the lo
Bert Huijben wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 21:34 +, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> > > (install_added_props): Remove call to
> > svn_wc__db_base_set_dav_cache()
> > > as the only caller, svn_wc_add_repos_file4() should never change
> > > BASE_NODE information. (T
On Sun, 2010-03-07, dan...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: dannas
> Date: Sun Mar 7 21:21:58 2010
> New Revision: 920118
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920118&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix issue #3483 - extend svn_client_upgrade() to include externals. I've
> done the externals upgrading after wc
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:12 +, Matthew Bentham wrote:
> Revisions 920521 and later fail some tests for me.
>
> The first test program in 'make check' that fails is
> 'checkout_tests.py'. After that quite a few fail, including
> commit_tests.py and copy_tests.py.
>
> I'm letting make check
On Tue, 2010-03-09, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Mar 9 13:53:38 2010
> New Revision: 920875
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920875&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove some access batons from post-commit processing.
Hi Philip.
You could add "SVN_DEPRECATED" to svn_wc_queu
"Bert Huijben" writes:
> Please use svn_wc__context_create_with_db() if you need to wrap a db.
Already spotted that.
--
Philip
Julian Foad writes:
> You could add "SVN_DEPRECATED" to svn_wc_queue_committed2(). (You added
> it to svn_wc_process_committed_queue().)
>
> Hyrum suggests the deprecated functions should be moved to
> 'deprecated.c'.
Will do.
--
Philip
On Mon, 2010-03-08, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Mon Mar 8 14:35:42 2010
> New Revision: 920336
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920336&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove access baton from svn_client__harvest_committables. Explicitly
> use absolute paths in svn_client__copy_p
On 09/03/2010 15:40, Julian Foad wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:12 +, Matthew Bentham wrote:
Revisions 920521 and later fail some tests for me.
The first test program in 'make check' that fails is
'checkout_tests.py'. After that quite a few fail, including
commit_tests.py and copy_tests.p
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 20:40 +0100, Stefan Fuhrman wrote:
> While profiling TSVN's SVN proper access code,
> I found that about 40% of the runtime was spent in
> svn_config_get_config(). The reason was the config
> parser fetching individual bytes from the input stream.
>
> However, translated_stre
On Sun, 2010-03-07, Stefan Fuhrman wrote:
> Speed up input stream processing in config parser and
> others that read single bytes from a stream.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/subst.c
> (translated_stream_read): Add an optimized code path
> for single byte read requests.
>
> Patch by: Stefan
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 08:53, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_wc.h Tue Mar 9 13:53:38 2010
> @@ -4729,14 +4729,14 @@ svn_wc_committed_queue_create(apr_pool_t
>
> /**
> * Queue committed items to be processed later by
> - * svn_wc_process_committed_queue().
> + * svn_w
I'm starting a test run, and while checkout_tests succeed for me, I
get a similar failure (to what you later posted) in blame_tests. Now
waiting for the tests to complete and will followup with some more
data when available.
Thanks for raising awareness here!
Also, in the future, could you change
I got the following failures:
FAIL: blame_tests.py 10: test 'svn blame -g'
FAIL: blame_tests.py 11: don't look for merged files out of range
FAIL: log_tests.py 16: test 'svn log -g' on a single revision
FAIL: log_tests.py 17: test 'svn log -g' on a branching revision
FAIL: log_tests.py 18: te
And per Matt's original note, when I back-rev'd to 920520, all of
these tests pass.
Investigating
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 15:22, Greg Stein wrote:
> I got the following failures:
>
> FAIL: blame_tests.py 10: test 'svn blame -g'
> FAIL: blame_tests.py 11: don't look for merged files out of r
Fixed in r921142, with attribution to Matthew.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 16:13, Greg Stein wrote:
> And per Matt's original note, when I back-rev'd to 920520, all of
> these tests pass.
>
> Investigating
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 15:22, Greg Stein wrote:
>> I got the following failures:
>>
>>
On 03/09/2010 02:41 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Tue Mar 9 22:41:16 2010
New Revision: 921181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921181&view=rev
Log:
JavaHL: Fix a few header files to avoid a redundant declaration of SVN::Pool.
Instead of declaring the class (when it m
On 03/09/2010 02:34 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Tue Mar 9 22:34:00 2010
New Revision: 921176
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921176&view=rev
Log:
JavaHL: Create a new C++ class which represents a generic array of Java
objects. Move the various collection parsing d
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 02:41 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Mar 9 22:41:16 2010
>> New Revision: 921181
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921181&view=rev
>> Log:
>> JavaHL: Fix a few header files to avoid a redunda
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 02:41 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Mar 9 22:41:16 2010
>> New Revision: 921181
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921181&view=rev
>> Log:
>> JavaHL: Fix a few header files to avoid a redunda
On 03/09/2010 03:05 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 03/09/2010 02:41 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Tue Mar 9 22:41:16 2010
New Revision: 921181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921181&view=rev
Log:
JavaHL: Fix a few hea
Hi, after a long pause I started to analyze the SQL backend again. I'm
just studying the BDB and FSFS backends to collect all requirements
needed to design the SQL scheme.
1) I have already taken a look at the SVN source to find out, which
operations in the DAG (repository tree) are used mostl
Sorry, the attachment forgotten :)
Dne 10.3.2010 00:50, Jan Horák napsal(a):
Hi, after a long pause I started to analyze the SQL backend again. I'm
just studying the BDB and FSFS backends to collect all requirements
needed to design the SQL scheme.
1) I have already taken a look at the SVN so
31 matches
Mail list logo
