On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Still short a unix signature for this. Need to get a vote and a
> signature ASAP so that we can have things staged for release tomorrow.
The vote from stefan2 gets us the votes we needed. His signature will
not be on the release because he di
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
> 23rd so please try and
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Prabhu wrote:
> Summary:
>
>
>+1 to release.
Unless I'm mistaken this is a non-binding vote. So I'm still short a
vote for unix.
On 07/17/2013 10:58 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
23rd so please try and get your votes/sig
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
> 23rd so please try and
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
> 23rd so please try and g
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
> 23rd so please try and g
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Am I correct that Serf has not done a new release yet?
That's correct. I know Greg is working to have 1.3.0 out before or
around the same time as our 1.8.1 comes out.
> Which of our bugs will still be bugs? I am thinking of this more from
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
> 23rd so please try and g
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:28:00PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
> 23rd so please t
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
> 23rd so please try and g
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/wheezy) 64-bit
Tested:
(local, svn, svn/sasl, serf, serf/v1) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb, ctypes
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
All tests PASS except for expected failures of checkout_tests.py 12.
Local d
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> I know this is a holiday week for some people but I'd like to start
> producing a 1.8.1 next Monday. So if everyone can look at the STATUS
> file for 1.8.x and get any things they want in there I'll produce a
> 1.8.1 tarball for voting sometime
On 07/09/2013 10:47 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
I think it worth to release 1.8.1 without chunked requests proxy fixes:
1. We have 75 revisions merged to 1.8.x since 1.8.0. Some of them
critical. (see attached file)
2. Discussion about chunked reques
On 09.07.2013 19:47, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> I think it worth to release 1.8.1 without chunked requests proxy fixes:
>> 1. We have 75 revisions merged to 1.8.x since 1.8.0. Some of them
>> critical. (see attached file)
>> 2. Discussion about chunke
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> I think it worth to release 1.8.1 without chunked requests proxy fixes:
> 1. We have 75 revisions merged to 1.8.x since 1.8.0. Some of them
> critical. (see attached file)
> 2. Discussion about chunked requests fixes is still going and it's
> b
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> Just a nudge to everyone to take a look at STATUS so I can cut the
>> tarball later today. I'll be working through STATUS myself today and
>> will be on IRC giving people a chance to get their
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Just a nudge to everyone to take a look at STATUS so I can cut the
> tarball later today. I'll be working through STATUS myself today and
> will be on IRC giving people a chance to get their stuff in.
I have not cut the tarball today because the
Just a nudge to everyone to take a look at STATUS so I can cut the
tarball later today. I'll be working through STATUS myself today and
will be on IRC giving people a chance to get their stuff in.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> I know this is a holiday week for some people b
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>...
> In my opinion it's OK to release 1.8.1, and just put in the release
> notes that in order to fix those problems, one needs to build with
> Serf-1.2.2 or later.
1.2.2 is a patch release. No need to build against it. Building
against 1.2.x
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> In my opinion it's OK to release 1.8.1, and just put in the release
> notes that in order to fix those problems, one needs to build with
> Serf-1.2.2 or later. I expect that most people can get along just fine
> with Serf-1.2.1; and, as Greg p
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 20:12:11 +0200:
>> On 01.07.2013 20:08, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Lieven Govaerts wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 19:44:24 +0200:
>> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> >>> On Mo
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 20:12:11 +0200:
> On 01.07.2013 20:08, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Lieven Govaerts wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 19:44:24 +0200:
> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> I know t
On 01.07.2013 20:08, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 19:44:24 +0200:
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
I know this is a holiday week for some people but I'd like to start
prod
Lieven Govaerts wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 19:44:24 +0200:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> >> I know this is a holiday week for some people but I'd like to start
> >> producing a 1.8.1 next Monday. So if everyone ca
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> I know this is a holiday week for some people but I'd like to start
>> producing a 1.8.1 next Monday. So if everyone can look at the STATUS
>> file for 1.8.x and get any things they want in
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> I know this is a holiday week for some people but I'd like to start
> producing a 1.8.1 next Monday. So if everyone can look at the STATUS
> file for 1.8.x and get any things they want in there I'll produce a
> 1.8.1 tarball for voting sometime o
27 matches
Mail list logo
