Re: [PATCH] Follow-up to r1138830. Fix comment in test.

2011-06-23 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Noorul Islam K M writes: > Log > [[[ > > Follow-up to r1138830. Remove comment in test which became absolute > after r1138830. Add new comment related to issue #3936. > > * subversion/tests/cmdline/log_tests.py > (log_with_unrelated_peg_and_operative_revs): Fix absolute comment and > add n

[PATCH] Follow-up to r1138830. Fix comment in test.

2011-06-23 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Log [[[ Follow-up to r1138830. Remove comment in test which became absolute after r1138830. Add new comment related to issue #3936. * subversion/tests/cmdline/log_tests.py (log_with_unrelated_peg_and_operative_revs): Fix absolute comment and add new relevant one. Patch by: Noorul Islam K

Implement support for 'make check' variants

2011-06-23 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Daniel came up with idea of extending Makefile.in to support 'make check' variants. 1. 'make check' with svnserve -T 2. 'make check' with svnadmin create --pre-1.x-compatible (where x in (1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7)) 3. 'make check' with SVNPathAuthz short_circuit. As of now this is supported by st

What to expect from svn log?

2011-06-23 Thread Dirk Thomas
I have recently looked into issue 3830 (forward revision range) and thereby found issue 3931 (returning log of unrelated path). While implementing support for forward revision ranges i came across various cases, where i would like to resolve what is actually expected/desired: - what "svn log" cu

Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Branko Čibej
On 23.06.2011 22:59, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] >> Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 22:30 >> To: Bert Huijben >> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in >> /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_ty

Re: svn commit: r1139080 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

2011-06-23 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 17:20, wrote: >... > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c Thu Jun 23 21:20:49 2011 > @@ -6068,16 +6068,15 @@ op_delete_txn(void *baton, >   SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__step(&have_row, stmt)); >   if (have_row) >     { > -      const char *absent_path > -        = svn_

Re: svn commit: r1139096 - in /subversion/site/publish: index.html news.html

2011-06-23 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:24, wrote: > Author: hwright > Date: Thu Jun 23 22:24:53 2011 > New Revision: 1139096 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1139096&view=rev > Log: > Update news sections of the website to reflect 1.7.0-alpha2. > > * publish/ne

Re: [PATCH] possible improvement to svn log with "forward" revision range (issue 3830)

2011-06-23 Thread Dirk Thomas
Well, since issue 3931 was fixed today ('svn log' is returning log of unrelated path when peg revision is not related to operative revision) i revisited my patch for issue 3830. + /* try fetching ra_session again + * this time with modified revision argument. + * @todo modify already existing

Apache Subversion 1.7.0-alpha2 Released

2011-06-23 Thread Hyrum Wright
I'm happy to announce Apache Subversion 1.7.0-alpha2, the next public pre-release of the 1.7.x series, is now available. Please choose the closest mirror to you by visiting: http://subversion.apache.org/download/#pre-releases The SHA1 checksums are: 05cebe1817e171e20dcf5ffa6dce9612217525

"Apache's APR version doesn't match configure's"

2011-06-23 Thread Hyrum K Wright
The error in the subject has been showing up on the Mac OS X buildslaves for the past few days (see http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-macosx-gnu-shared/builds/1388/steps/Build/logs/stdio), but nobody has done much about it. However, this afternoon I ran autogen.sh and configure on my own trunk

Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread 'Daniel Shahaf'
Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 23:31:42 +0200: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 23:26 > > To: Bert Huijben > > Cc: 'Greg Stein'; dev@subversion.apache.org > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1132968

RE: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 23:26 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Greg Stein'; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h > >

Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 22:59:47 +0200: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 22:30 > > To: Bert Huijben > > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in > > /subversion/tru

cache-membuffer.c entry_t

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan, [[[ /* A single dictionary entry. Since they are allocated statically, these * entries can either be in use or in used state. An entry is unused, iff * the offset member is NO_OFFSET. In that case, it must not be linked in * the list of used entries. */ typedef struct entry_t ]]] Firs

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
[C. Michael Pilato] > - spool the diff, count the lines in it, and provide that count in > some fashion > - indent the diff by a single column > - wrap the whole diff in some start/end markers ("[[[" and "]]]", e.g.) I like the last option, except that I'd use "\n" as the end marker, an

Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: > But most importantly > #define SVN_VER_TAG        " (under development)" > #define SVN_VER_NUMTAG     "-dev" > #define SVN_VER_REVISION   0 > > These are redefined by third party distributions that somehow influence how > Subversion is built

RE: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 22:30 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at

Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 15:47, Bert Huijben wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] >> Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 21:01 >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in >> /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_v

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-23 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:32:37PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 06/23/2011 03:18 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > > Why do we have to do anything? There is no danger of breaking > > existing scripts here because this requires adding an additional > > option. Do we just feel like it would be imp

[PATCH] serf patch for issue 3917

2011-06-23 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi Bert, this patch seems to solve issue 3917 on pburba's test pc. Given the error location you mentioned in desc6 I suspect it's the same issue. Can you test and see if it solves it for you? thanks, Lieven Index: outgoing.c === -

Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] >> Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 21:01 >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in >> /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn

RE: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 21:01 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 08:14, wrote: > > A

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-23 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/23/2011 03:18 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > Why do we have to do anything? There is no danger of breaking > existing scripts here because this requires adding an additional > option. Do we just feel like it would be impossible to parse the > current output? Can't --xml be used? The current o

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 15:15:08 -0400: > We discussed in IRC some solutions: > > - spool the diff, count the lines in it, and provide that count in > some fashion > - indent the diff by a single column > - wrap the whole diff in some start/end markers ("[[[" and

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-23 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:15 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > When we designed 'svn log' many moons ago, we added the "N lines" header > information to aid parsers of the output.  Most of us had had poor > experiences with parsers looking for sentinel lines which could themselves > appear inside the

'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-23 Thread C. Michael Pilato
When we designed 'svn log' many moons ago, we added the "N lines" header information to aid parsers of the output. Most of us had had poor experiences with parsers looking for sentinel lines which could themselves appear inside the delimited content. We didn't want to see folks writing scripts ar

Re: svn commit: r1132968 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include: svn_types.h svn_version.h

2011-06-23 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 08:14, wrote: > Author: rhuijben > Date: Tue Jun  7 12:14:14 2011 > New Revision: 1132968 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1132968&view=rev > Log: > Following up on r1132965, just move the type. This matches how we handled the > problem for svn_error_t. > > * subve

Re: [Patch] get-deps.sh fails to find sqlite-amalgamation

2011-06-23 Thread Simon Olofsson
On 23 Jun 2011, at 19:00, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > This is a part of r1134734. Backport proposed. Thanks! Great, thanks Daniel. Simon

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: >> Thanks for taking the time to do thus. Only recently did I realize that I >> named the function incorrectly when I came up with it. In PoCore, I called >> it pc_error_trace(), for the same reasons you suggested here. > > OK

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
Greg Stein wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to do thus. Only recently did I realize that I > named the function incorrectly when I came up with it. In PoCore, I called > it pc_error_trace(), for the same reasons you suggested here. OK, I'll do it. Does anyone want me to leave "svn_error_return

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Greg Stein
Thanks for taking the time to do thus. Only recently did I realize that I named the function incorrectly when I came up with it. In PoCore, I called it pc_error_trace(), for the same reasons you suggested here. On Jun 23, 2011 9:20 AM, "Julian Foad" wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:15 -0400, C

RE: svn_client_status_func_t callback - Java binding may expect an abspath

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
Bert Huijben wrote: > Javahl always calls status with an abspath target as its conversion to > a c string does that. OK, thanks. In r1139008 I've fixed the doc string and also documented a promise that svn_client_status5() will send an abspath to the callback if given an abspath. - Julian > Be

RE: svn_client_status_func_t callback - Java binding may expect an abspath

2011-06-23 Thread Bert Huijben
Javahl always calls status with an abspath target as its conversion to a c string does that. Bert Huijben (Cell phone) From: Julian Foad Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 18:48 To: dev@subversion.apache.org; Hyrum Wright Subject: svn_client_status_func_t callback - Java binding may expect an abspath Hy

Re: [Patch] get-deps.sh fails to find sqlite-amalgamation

2011-06-23 Thread Simon Olofsson
On 23 Jun 2011, at 17:32, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> when trying to build SVN 1.6 from this branch: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x >> get-deps.sh fails, because sqlite-amalgamation has been moved: >> >> --2011-06-23 14:47:38-- >> http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-amalgamation

Re: [Patch] get-deps.sh fails to find sqlite-amalgamation

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Simon Olofsson wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:14:20 +0200: > On 23 Jun 2011, at 17:32, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> when trying to build SVN 1.6 from this branch: > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x > >> get-deps.sh fails, because sqlite-amalgamation has been moved: > >>

svn_client_status_func_t callback - Java binding may expect an abspath

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
Hyrum or anyone, svn_client_status_func_t is declared as /** A callback for reporting a @a status about @a local_abspath. ... */ typedef svn_error_t *(*svn_client_status_func_t)( void *baton, const char *path,

Re: [Patch] get-deps.sh fails to find sqlite-amalgamation

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
moving to dev@ Simon Olofsson wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 15:05:39 +0200: > Hi, > > when trying to build SVN 1.6 from this branch: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x > get-deps.sh fails, because sqlite-amalgamation has been moved: > > --2011-06-23 14:47:38-- > http://

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2011-06-23 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:55:22PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > For the record here is the log message and diff to make this change. > Index: subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.h > === > --- subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.h (revision 1138

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2011-06-23 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:35:36PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:17:19AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > On 06/23/2011 10:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > >> Now, I'm fine with using something

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 16:35 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:17:19AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > On 06/23/2011 10:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > >> Now, I'm fine with using something other

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2011-06-23 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/23/2011 10:35 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:17:19AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 06/23/2011 10:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: Now, I'm fine with using something other than "absent" ("

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2011-06-23 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:17:19AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 06/23/2011 10:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > >> Now, I'm fine with using something other than "absent" ("omitted", > >> "withheld", ...), but -1 on any ter

Re: 1.7.0-alpha2 tarballs up for signing / testing

2011-06-23 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:12 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 06/22/2011 05:06 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> Thanks to those have have provided signatures.  I've sent the tarballs >> to the mirrors for distribution.  The official release should happen >> tomorrow. > > Better late than never?  (Tes

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2011-06-23 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/23/2011 10:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Now, I'm fine with using something other than "absent" ("omitted", >> "withheld", ...), but -1 on any terminology that allows the WC to presume to >> know what it simply cannot. >

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2011-06-23 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > On 06/23/2011 09:33 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: stsp > > Date: Thu Jun 23 13:33:57 2011 > > New Revision: 1138871 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138871&view=rev > > Log: > > As part of internal API c

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2011-06-23 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/23/2011 09:33 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > Author: stsp > Date: Thu Jun 23 13:33:57 2011 > New Revision: 1138871 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138871&view=rev > Log: > As part of internal API cleanup, and in the name of code clarity, > rename svn_wc__db_status_absent to svn_wc_

RE: API review - the 'commit_as_operations' flag on svn_client_commit5()

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
I (Julian Foad) wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:33 +0200, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > > > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 12:37 > > > To: Subversion Development > > > Subject: API review - the 'commit_as_operat

RE: API review - the 'commit_as_operations' flag on svn_client_commit5()

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:33 +0200, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 12:37 > > To: Subversion Development > > Subject: API review - the 'commit_as_operations' flag on > > svn_client_commit5(

RE: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 15:20 > To: C. Michael Pilato > Cc: Subversion > Subject: Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'? > > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:15 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:15 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 06/23/2011 09:13 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > To avoid this problem we could call it svn_error_trace1, or even > > svn_error_trace2 since it is technically an upgrade from svn_error_return :) > > Or svn_error_traced() indicating th

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:15:24 -0400: > On 06/23/2011 09:13 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > To avoid this problem we could call it svn_error_trace1, or even > > svn_error_trace2 since it is technically an upgrade from svn_error_return :) > > Or svn_error_traced() indicatin

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/23/2011 09:13 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > To avoid this problem we could call it svn_error_trace1, or even > svn_error_trace2 since it is technically an upgrade from svn_error_return :) Or svn_error_traced() indicating that we've traced the error to this spot (so far). :-) -- C. Michael

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:57:28AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Omigosh. +1. I, too, know we're well into bikeshed territory here, but if > we're going to paint our sheds anyway, why use only a clear-coat stain > ("return svn_error_return(...)")? Use a color that says something! Yes, +1!

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:57:28 -0400: > Omigosh. +1. I, too, know we're well into bikeshed territory here, but if > we're going to paint our sheds anyway, why use only a clear-coat stain > ("return svn_error_return(...)")? Use a color that says something! > > "svn_erro

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Omigosh. +1. I, too, know we're well into bikeshed territory here, but if we're going to paint our sheds anyway, why use only a clear-coat stain ("return svn_error_return(...)")? Use a color that says something! "svn_error_trace" is a fine choice of a name. Just a pity that it's a character sh

Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813

2011-06-23 Thread 'Daniel Shahaf'
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 15:25:37 +0530: > "Bert Huijben" writes: > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Noorul Islam K M [mailto:noo...@collab.net] > >> Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 5:44 > >> To: Daniel Shahaf > >> Cc: Julian Foad; Subversion; Bert Huijben > >> Subjec

RE: API review - the 'commit_as_operations' flag on svn_client_commit5()

2011-06-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 12:37 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: API review - the 'commit_as_operations' flag on > svn_client_commit5() > > I'd like to understand the new 'commit_as_operations' flag on

Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813

2011-06-23 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Stefan Sperling writes: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:25:37PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > >> I thought if the patch was incorrect, I might be getting some feedback. > > Sorry, sometimes things just fall through the cracks :( > > Please don't take this as something personal. Nothing personal

Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3931.

2011-06-23 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Stefan Sperling writes: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:02:23PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > >> >> Log >> >> [[[ >> >> Fix for issue 3931. 'svn log' is returning log of unrelated path when >> peg revision is not related to operative revision. This is happening >> when HEAD is used in operat

Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3931.

2011-06-23 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:02:23PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > > Log > > [[[ > > Fix for issue 3931. 'svn log' is returning log of unrelated path when > peg revision is not related to operative revision. This is happening > when HEAD is used in operative range. This commit fixes this. >

Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813

2011-06-23 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:25:37PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > I thought if the patch was incorrect, I might be getting some feedback. Sorry, sometimes things just fall through the cracks :( Please don't take this as something personal. Communications can be delayed or simply get lost since

Re: API change - rename svn_hash_get_cstring/bool() to svn_config_hash_get_*()

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
On Mon, 2011-06-20, Julian Foad wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-15, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > On 15.06.2011 15:29, Julian Foad wrote: > > > A heads-up: I'm renaming svn_hash_get_bool() to > > > svn_config_hash_get_bool(), and svn_hash_get_cstring() to > > > svn_config_hash_get(), moving them from svn_ha

API review - the 'commit_as_operations' flag on svn_client_commit5()

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
I'd like to understand the new 'commit_as_operations' flag on svn_client_commit5() a bit better. First, note that the old commit4() API passes FALSE. The doc string says: * If @a commit_as_operations is set to FALSE, when a copy is committed * all changes below the copy are always committed at

[PATCH] Fix for issue 3931.

2011-06-23 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Log [[[ Fix for issue 3931. 'svn log' is returning log of unrelated path when peg revision is not related to operative revision. This is happening when HEAD is used in operative range. This commit fixes this. * subversion/libsvn_client/log.c (svn_client_log5): Handle HEAD in operative revis

[RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
Another new-in-1.7 API. A rather trivial one, this, and I don't want this to be a long bikeshed discussion, but just looking at usage of the new svn_error_return() macro, typified by these examples ... cmt_err = svn_error_return( check_nonrecursive_dir_delete(ctx->wc_ctx, ...));

Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813

2011-06-23 Thread Noorul Islam K M
"Bert Huijben" writes: >> -Original Message- >> From: Noorul Islam K M [mailto:noo...@collab.net] >> Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 5:44 >> To: Daniel Shahaf >> Cc: Julian Foad; Subversion; Bert Huijben >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813 >> >> Daniel Shahaf writes: >> >> > Looks

RE: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813

2011-06-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Noorul Islam K M [mailto:noo...@collab.net] > Sent: donderdag 23 juni 2011 5:44 > To: Daniel Shahaf > Cc: Julian Foad; Subversion; Bert Huijben > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813 > > Daniel Shahaf writes: > > > Looks like Bert committed a functionally

Re: svn commit: r1138375 - /subversion/trunk/build/ac-macros/apache.m4

2011-06-23 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf writes: > What if httpd or serf use apr-1.4.5 compiled with options X and > Subversion find apr-1.4.5 compiled with options Y? The user can always break things. They could build Subversion against APR and then rebuild APR with different options. I suppose we (somebody with more d