On 06/23/2011 10:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Now, I'm fine with using something other than "absent" ("omitted",
>> "withheld", ...), but -1 on any terminology that allows the WC to presume to
>> know what it simply cannot.
>
> Julian also suggested "server-excluded". Would that work?Sure! That would work quite well, actually. Now, understand that we'd still have "absent" in the RA layers, editor vtable, etc.. I seem to recall you being somewhat vocal about such inconsistencies in the past. But maybe we can tweak those things over time, too, as necessary (editorv2). -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
