Sorry, the attachment forgotten :)
Dne 10.3.2010 00:50, Jan Horák napsal(a):
Hi, after a long pause I started to analyze the SQL backend again. I'm
just studying the BDB and FSFS backends to collect all requirements
needed to design the SQL scheme.
1) I have already taken a look at the SVN so
Hi, after a long pause I started to analyze the SQL backend again. I'm
just studying the BDB and FSFS backends to collect all requirements
needed to design the SQL scheme.
1) I have already taken a look at the SVN source to find out, which
operations in the DAG (repository tree) are used mostl
On 03/09/2010 03:05 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 03/09/2010 02:41 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Tue Mar 9 22:41:16 2010
New Revision: 921181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921181&view=rev
Log:
JavaHL: Fix a few hea
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 02:41 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Mar 9 22:41:16 2010
>> New Revision: 921181
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921181&view=rev
>> Log:
>> JavaHL: Fix a few header files to avoid a redunda
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 02:41 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Mar 9 22:41:16 2010
>> New Revision: 921181
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921181&view=rev
>> Log:
>> JavaHL: Fix a few header files to avoid a redunda
On 03/09/2010 02:34 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Tue Mar 9 22:34:00 2010
New Revision: 921176
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921176&view=rev
Log:
JavaHL: Create a new C++ class which represents a generic array of Java
objects. Move the various collection parsing d
On 03/09/2010 02:41 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Tue Mar 9 22:41:16 2010
New Revision: 921181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921181&view=rev
Log:
JavaHL: Fix a few header files to avoid a redundant declaration of SVN::Pool.
Instead of declaring the class (when it m
Fixed in r921142, with attribution to Matthew.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 16:13, Greg Stein wrote:
> And per Matt's original note, when I back-rev'd to 920520, all of
> these tests pass.
>
> Investigating
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 15:22, Greg Stein wrote:
>> I got the following failures:
>>
>>
And per Matt's original note, when I back-rev'd to 920520, all of
these tests pass.
Investigating
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 15:22, Greg Stein wrote:
> I got the following failures:
>
> FAIL: blame_tests.py 10: test 'svn blame -g'
> FAIL: blame_tests.py 11: don't look for merged files out of r
I got the following failures:
FAIL: blame_tests.py 10: test 'svn blame -g'
FAIL: blame_tests.py 11: don't look for merged files out of range
FAIL: log_tests.py 16: test 'svn log -g' on a single revision
FAIL: log_tests.py 17: test 'svn log -g' on a branching revision
FAIL: log_tests.py 18: te
I'm starting a test run, and while checkout_tests succeed for me, I
get a similar failure (to what you later posted) in blame_tests. Now
waiting for the tests to complete and will followup with some more
data when available.
Thanks for raising awareness here!
Also, in the future, could you change
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 08:53, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_wc.h Tue Mar 9 13:53:38 2010
> @@ -4729,14 +4729,14 @@ svn_wc_committed_queue_create(apr_pool_t
>
> /**
> * Queue committed items to be processed later by
> - * svn_wc_process_committed_queue().
> + * svn_w
On Sun, 2010-03-07, Stefan Fuhrman wrote:
> Speed up input stream processing in config parser and
> others that read single bytes from a stream.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/subst.c
> (translated_stream_read): Add an optimized code path
> for single byte read requests.
>
> Patch by: Stefan
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 20:40 +0100, Stefan Fuhrman wrote:
> While profiling TSVN's SVN proper access code,
> I found that about 40% of the runtime was spent in
> svn_config_get_config(). The reason was the config
> parser fetching individual bytes from the input stream.
>
> However, translated_stre
On 09/03/2010 15:40, Julian Foad wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:12 +, Matthew Bentham wrote:
Revisions 920521 and later fail some tests for me.
The first test program in 'make check' that fails is
'checkout_tests.py'. After that quite a few fail, including
commit_tests.py and copy_tests.p
Julian Foad writes:
> You could add "SVN_DEPRECATED" to svn_wc_queue_committed2(). (You added
> it to svn_wc_process_committed_queue().)
>
> Hyrum suggests the deprecated functions should be moved to
> 'deprecated.c'.
Will do.
--
Philip
"Bert Huijben" writes:
> Please use svn_wc__context_create_with_db() if you need to wrap a db.
Already spotted that.
--
Philip
On Tue, 2010-03-09, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Mar 9 13:53:38 2010
> New Revision: 920875
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920875&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove some access batons from post-commit processing.
Hi Philip.
You could add "SVN_DEPRECATED" to svn_wc_queu
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:12 +, Matthew Bentham wrote:
> Revisions 920521 and later fail some tests for me.
>
> The first test program in 'make check' that fails is
> 'checkout_tests.py'. After that quite a few fail, including
> commit_tests.py and copy_tests.py.
>
> I'm letting make check
On Sun, 2010-03-07, dan...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: dannas
> Date: Sun Mar 7 21:21:58 2010
> New Revision: 920118
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920118&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix issue #3483 - extend svn_client_upgrade() to include externals. I've
> done the externals upgrading after wc
Bert Huijben wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 21:34 +, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> > > (install_added_props): Remove call to
> > svn_wc__db_base_set_dav_cache()
> > > as the only caller, svn_wc_add_repos_file4() should never change
> > > BASE_NODE information. (T
Revisions 920521 and later fail some tests for me.
The first test program in 'make check' that fails is
'checkout_tests.py'. After that quite a few fail, including
commit_tests.py and copy_tests.py.
I'm letting make check run to completion now for current head (r920875)
and I'll post the lo
> -Original Message-
> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 9 maart 2010 13:30
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r920839 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Mar 9 12:29:58 2010
>
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Does this mean that we don't have to do anything special to apply
> for Gsoc, but just apply for slots within ASF when the time comes?
Yup - you just apply internally.
I believe someone from SVN should subscribe to
d...@community.apache.or
On Mon, 2010-03-08, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Mon Mar 8 14:35:42 2010
> New Revision: 920336
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920336&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove access baton from svn_client__harvest_committables. Explicitly
> use absolute paths in svn_client__copy_p
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:55 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Paul Burba wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> Do you recall what version of Subversion you used to do the
>> REVISIONIST HISTORY work
>> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/README)?
>>
>> I'm assuming it was probably 1.6.6, which was the curre
Julian Foad writes:
>> +/* The absolute destination's parent path */
>> +const char *dst_parent_abspath;
>
> "The absolute path or URL of the destination's parent" ?
Yes. Tweaked.
--
Philip
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 9 maart 2010 11:15
> To: rhuij...@apache.org; dev@subversion.apache.org;
> comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r920526 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 21:34 +, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Mon Mar 8 21:34:38 2010
> New Revision: 920526
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920526&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
> (install_added_props): Remove call to svn_wc__db_ba
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:27:30PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> If I was correct about 12 march beeing the deadline for organisationz to
> apply for GSoC, it's four days left today.
>
> I hope noone thinks I'm too pushy about this. Just wanted to rule out
> the risk of us missing the last date (
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 07:28:13AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Google Summer of Code is on for 2010 [1]. Is there any interest in
> > participating this year? If so, I've found that the mentoring
> > application deadline
31 matches
Mail list logo
