Matteo,
Overall the proposal looks good to me.
I have a couple of points, about the 'VOTE' and about what is subject to a
PIP or not.
I will add my comments inline below
Shall we need a "meta PIP" for this PIP ? Just joking, this discussion is
probably enough.
Thank you very much, we really neede
+1, the proposal looks good to me!
Thanks,
Penghui
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 3:49 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Matteo,
> Overall the proposal looks good to me.
> I have a couple of points, about the 'VOTE' and about what is subject to a
> PIP or not.
> I will add my comments inline below
>
> Shall
+1,lgtm
Best Regards.
Jia Zhai
Beijing, China
Mobile: +86 15810491983
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 4:20 PM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1, the proposal looks good to me!
>
> Thanks,
> Penghui
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 3:49 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Matteo,
> > Overall the proposal looks go
Moving back to dev.
Since it seems like there's some confusion on this point, it's perfectly
normal for PMC discussions around new proposals with decision-making
authority by the PMC to take place on the public dev list. The private
list is only necessary when confidentiality is required, and the
Hi,
My two cents as a mere contributor who once wrote a PIP. I would love to
see PIPs as a versioned document in git instead of the Wiki. This would
provide history and context, make it easy to comment and propose fixes and
enhancements which is currently not possible with the Wiki. The PMC would
> My two cents as a mere contributor who once wrote a PIP. I would love to
> see PIPs as a versioned document in git instead of the Wiki. This would
> provide history and context, make it easy to comment and propose fixes and
> enhancements which is currently not possible with the Wiki. The PMC wou
This meetup was the oldest, started by founders of the Apache Pulsar.It has 338
members. And recent event in May 2021.
https://www.meetup.com/SF-Bay-Area-Apache-Pulsar-Meetup/
Thank you./Sree
On Thursday, August 19, 2021, 05:35:43 AM PDT, Jonathan Ellis
wrote:
Moving back to dev.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:49 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I agree that the CLI is really an API, but sometimes we add options in a
> very straightforward way,
> I am not sure we must require a PIP for every option, especially if we are
> simply exposition some Pulsar Client feature that is not ava
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 6:29 AM Ivan Kelly wrote:
>
> > My two cents as a mere contributor who once wrote a PIP. I would love to
> > see PIPs as a versioned document in git instead of the Wiki. This would
> > provide history and context, make it easy to comment and propose fixes and
> > enhancemen
Hello all,
I think that there is some confusion on a couple of terms.
Vendor Neutrality- What we said caused a lot of confusion, what we meant
to say in the Marketing/Communications working group proposal is that we
wanted a diversity of members, rather than all volunteers to be from the
same co
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 5:35 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> Moving back to dev.
>
> Since it seems like there's some confusion on this point, it's perfectly
> normal for PMC discussions around new proposals with decision-making
> authority by the PMC to take place on the public dev list. The privat
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 4:26 PM Aaron Williams wrote:
> Meetups and the Umbrella Group-
> Having an Umbrella Group also prevents or at least makes it tougher for the
> “wild west” of meetup organizations to happen. For Apache Hadoop, both
> Cloudera and Hortonworks sponsored competing meetups ear
"Apache Pulsar Community" is not the PMC and that is 100% not the "Apache
Way™" If it said "Apache Pulsar Project" then I think that would be a
mischaracterization. I've helped run over 500 Apache-related meetups over
the past 10 years and myself and other organizers have always been careful
to us
+1, This proposal looks good to me!
Thanks,
Hang
Matteo Merli 于2021年8月20日周五 上午3:50写道：
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 6:29 AM Ivan Kelly wrote:
> >
> > > My two cents as a mere contributor who once wrote a PIP. I would love
> to
> > > see PIPs as a versioned document in git instead of the Wiki. This
*regarding "sub-committee"*
Let's be super clear here. This is not about the creation of a
sub-committee (or working group, whatever name to use here), which the PMC
may or may not do as it chooses. I can't speak for the entire PMC. The
major issue is if there is such a sub-committee, who is on it
Partick,
I am not a legal expert to answer the trademark question. I will consult
the trademarks team for this.
However, it is the PMC's responsibility to oversee the usage of "Apache
Pulsar" that follows the ASF policy.
- Sijie
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 5:23 PM Patrick McFadin wrote:
> "Apach
rayliu419 opened a new issue #151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/issues/151
Hi guys,
I am a new operator developer and I know operator has three ways to
implement. As far as I know, helm operator has limited functionalities compared
with other methods, so I a
pisceslj commented on issue #311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/311#issuecomment-902393941
The token is generated from the broker JWT private key as follows，maybe you
should config these parameters:
jwt.broker.token.mode=PRIVATE
jwt.broker.public.key=file:///pa
18 matches
Mail list logo
