[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-10-23 Thread hzh0425
Close this vote with 3 +1(binding) - Penghui - Jiwei Guo (Tboy) - Yunze BR, hzh Replied Message | From | guo jiwei | | Date | 10/23/2023 18:22 | | To | | | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level | +1 (binding) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy

Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-10-23 Thread guo jiwei
ply to cancel his -1 binding. > > > > > > > > > > > > Replied Message > > > | From | Dave Fisher | > > > | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | > > > | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org | > > > | Cc | | > > > | Subject | Re: [VOT

Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-10-22 Thread Yunze Xu
o | dev@pulsar.apache.org | > > | Cc | | > > | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption > > isolation level | > > -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the > > proper course of action. > > > > Regards, &g

Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-10-22 Thread PengHui Li
1 binding. > > > > Replied Message > | From | Dave Fisher | > | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | > | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org | > | Cc | | > | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption > isolation level | > -1 (binding) I’m not convin

[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-10-22 Thread hzh0425
| dev@pulsar.apache.org | | Cc | | | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level | -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the proper course of action. Regards, Dave > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 wrote: > &g

[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-10-19 Thread hzh0425
Hi dev, This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level. Discuss thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 Doc: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/712 BR,

[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-10-18 Thread hzh0425
Hi dev, This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level. Discuss thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 Doc: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/712 BR,

Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-09-25 Thread Dave Fisher
-1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the proper course of action. Regards, Dave > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 wrote: > > Hi dev, > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying > consumption isolation level > Discuss thread:

[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

2023-09-25 Thread hzh0425
Hi dev, This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level Discuss thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11 PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull