+1 (binding) Thanks, Yunze
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:08 PM PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 <hzh0...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue > > to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due > > to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding. > > > > > > > > ---- Replied Message ---- > > | From | Dave Fisher<w...@apache.org> | > > | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | > > | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org | > > | Cc | | > > | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption > > isolation level | > > -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the > > proper course of action. > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <hzh0...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi dev, > > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying > > consumption isolation level > > > Discuss thread: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11 > > > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 > > > > > > BR, > > > hzh > >
