Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding.
---- Replied Message ---- | From | Dave Fisher<w...@apache.org> | | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org | | Cc | | | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level | -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the proper course of action. Regards, Dave > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <hzh0...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi dev, > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying > consumption isolation level > Discuss thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11 > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 > > BR, > hzh
