Close this vote with 3 +1(binding) - Penghui - Jiwei Guo (Tboy) - Yunze
BR, hzh ---- Replied Message ---- | From | guo jiwei<[email protected]> | | Date | 10/23/2023 18:22 | | To | <[email protected]> | | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level | +1 (binding) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:40 PM Yunze Xu <[email protected]> wrote: +1 (binding) Thanks, Yunze On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:08 PM PengHui Li <[email protected]> wrote: +1 (binding) Regards, Penghui On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 <[email protected]> wrote: Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding. ---- Replied Message ---- | From | Dave Fisher<[email protected]> | | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | | To | [email protected] | | Cc | | | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level | -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the proper course of action. Regards, Dave On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 <[email protected]> wrote: Hi dev, This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level Discuss thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11 PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 BR, hzh
