Re: [Great News] Pulsar Hits 10,000 GitHub Stars Milestone!

Being an early adopter happy to see the tremendous growth of community, contributions and features. Onwards and upwards !! Congratulations apache pulsar team 🎉 On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 11:07 AM Yu wrote: > Hi Pulsar enthusiasts, > > Our community has been growing ever-faster since it became a top-le

Re: Protocol Handlers in Pulsar Proxy

For K8s Should we use something like this https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/configuration/listeners/network_filters/kafka_broker_filter#config-network-filters-kafka-broker A pulsar filter in envoy would be great! On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 at 23:10, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Joe, > Thanks for

Re: PIP-26 - Delayed Messages and Exclusive subcriptions

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 07:40, Sijie Guo wrote: > Delayed delivery indicates out-of-order delivery. I am not sure how you can > preserve ordering with delayed delivery. It would be good to clarify the > semantic before stepping into implementations. > > - Sijie > > +1 > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 6:

Re: Pulsar Feature Matrix sheet - Client - Functions

This is a Great Initiative! Thanks a lot Jinfeng. On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 21:36, Jinfeng Huang wrote: > Dear Pulsar community members, > > The Pulsar Client and Functions features are now available in Feature > Matrix sheet >

Re: [Discuss] draft PIP for "Changes to GitHub Actions based Pulsar CI"

This is great news. Thanks Hari , Mateo and pulsar community On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 2:04 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > Dear Pulsar community members, > > The work on "Changes to GitHub Actions based Pulsar CI" has gone forward > based on your feedback. Here are some updates about the work. > > The draf

Re: [Blog] Taking an In-Depth Look at How to Achieve Isolation in Pulsar

Excellent 👍 On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, 10:30 PM Anonymitaet _ wrote: > Hi Pulsar enthusiasts, > > Hope you are doing well. > > As some of you may know, when organizing resources across multiple teams, > you can enforce Pulsar isolation policy to prevent resource competition and > attain stability. > T

Re: Fixing flaky tests: help needed

This is great news! On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 13:20, Lari Hotari wrote: > Hi all, > > There has been some great progress in fixing the flaky tests. It seems that > there's more stability in the builds after more fixes have been merged to > master. > This work has an impact. Thank you for the contri

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.6.3 Release

+1 On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 12:48, xiaolong ran wrote: > Hello everyone: > > I hope you’ve all been doing well. Last month, we released > Apache Pulsar 2.6.2, but due to cherry-pick, we did not include > some bug fixes, which resulted in some features users may not > be able to use. So I would like

Re: Rerun failure ci for pulsar-client-go

Great +1 On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:59, xiaolong ran wrote: > Hello everyone: > > We are very happy to tell you that in pulsar-client-go, we added > a bot action ci to rerun the failed test. Previously, because the > contributor did not have write access to this project, once the > test failed, t

Re: [VOTE] Remove CGO client from Apache pulsar repo

+1 On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 15:10, xiaolong ran wrote: > Hello all: > > As we discussed in the email > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1ccd23bf943835b2fb90b5f411b19edd4c27d5c572bed7544e4e4c2c@%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E, > > > We are currently no longer maintaining the CGO client version

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-Add ProtobufNative Schema Support

Hi Guowei, How does the nested protobuf will be handled? Lets say protobuf A embeds B do we register both of the schemas in the schema registry in single schema? On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 20:02, 王国伟 wrote: > ProtobufNative Schema Support proposes to import a new protobuf-v3 >

Re: [DISCUSS] Introduce a cherry-pick command for cherry-picking PRs automatically

This is awesome! On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 16:22, Yong Zhang wrote: > Hi developers, > I want to introduce a command for cherry-picking PRs automatically. > > When we releasing a minor version of Pulsar, we need to cherry-pick the bug > fix PRs > into the release branch. Cherry-pick a lot of PRs w

Re: PIP 69: Schema design for pulsar-client-go

Hi Xiaolong, is there any progress made on this ? We would like to help on this . Please let me know how we can proceed further On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 08:34, Yuva raj wrote: > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-43%3A-producer-send-message-with-different-schema > > Yes t

Re: PIP 69: Schema design for pulsar-client-go

> - Sijie > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:12 PM Yuva raj wrote: > > > Thanks for bringing this up xiaolong. This is very much needed feature. > > Overall looks good . Adding schema in producer options will make one > schema > > bound to one producer. This works m

Re: PIP 69: Schema design for pulsar-client-go

Thanks for bringing this up xiaolong. This is very much needed feature. Overall looks good . Adding schema in producer options will make one schema bound to one producer. This works most of the time. But We produce multiple different types of messages in single topic (Ex avro: userCreated , account

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pulsarctl as part of Apache pulsar project

+1 On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 15:30, Yong Zhang wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a vote thread for accepting Pulsarctl[1] as part of > Apache Pulsar project. Pulsarctl is an alternative tool of pulsar-admin, > used to manage resources in Apache Pulsar. > > Please vote with your opinions. The v

Re: [Discuss] Replace cgo client in Pulsar repo with Native Go Client

+1 On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 7:49 PM xiaolong ran wrote: > Hello all: > > > Pulsar has provided [pulsar-client-go]( > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/pulsar-client-go < > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/pulsar-client-go>) > based on the CPP. However, CGO has many problems,

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate the pulsar-flink connector in main repo

+1 On Fri, Apr 10, 2020, 1:35 PM Shivji Kumar Jha wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Shivji Kumar Jha > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 4:05 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to raise a discussion on deprecating the pulsar-flink connector > in > > the main repo. > > > > The connector in the

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.1.0 Candidate 1 again

+1 On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 08:32, xiaolong ran wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.1.0, as > follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This is the first release ca

Re: Kafka-on-Pulsar: bring the native Kafka protocol support to Apache Pulsar

Awesome +1 On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 10:36, Sijie Guo wrote: > > Hi all, > > We are super excited to share that StreamNative and OVHcloud have just > open-sourced the Kafka-on-Pulsar (a.k.a KoP) protocol handler today. KoP is a > protocol handler that handles the Kafka 2.0+ protocol. It can be ins

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.1.0 Candidate 1

+1 On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 11:13, xiaolong ran wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.1.0, as > follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This is the first release ca

Re: [VOTE]Github action migration

+1 On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 7:40 AM Guangning E wrote: > Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the > test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread > for migration tests from Jenkins to Github action > > Please vote with your opinions. The

Re: Github action migration Discussion

+1 On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 08:36, Guangning E wrote: > > After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than > Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and > insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test. > > Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/j

Re: [Discuss] Create the first pulsar-client-go apache release

+1 On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 17:42, Sijie Guo wrote: > > Personally I think we should create the first release as early as possible. > This would allow more people starting using the native go client. We can > take more feedback from people when they start using it. We can add a note > that the curr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 2.4.2 released

This is awesome. Thanks a lot, Pulsar team and xiaolong ! On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 19:40, xiaolong ran wrote: > > The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 2.4.2. > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on > commodity hardware. It provides simp

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new committer: Yu Liu

Congrats YU Liu! On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 11:45, PengHui Li wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Pulsar > > has invited Yu Liu to become a committer and we are pleased > > to announce that her has accepted. > > > Yu has done good contribution to Apache Puls

Re: [Proposal] Develop document along with Pulsar release

Hi Yu Liu, I am so happy to hear this. +1 On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 11:31, anonymitaet _ wrote: > > Dear Pulsarer, > > > > As we know, whether you are a Pulsar developer or user, it’s always important > to have reliable documentation to guide our work. > > > > Recently, we are happy t

Re: [Discuss] Authentication and Authorization in Pulsar Manager

on permission > improvement in pulsar. On this basis, we can easily expand roles in > pulsar-manager to adapt to pulsar's permissions. > > Yuva raj 于2019年11月21日周四 下午8:07写道： > > > Hi Guangning, Overall looks good. I am looking forward for an example how > > can we cr

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Manager release 0.1.0 Candidate 4

+1 non binding On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 11:48 AM Guangning E wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the version 0.1.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > It fixes the followi

Re: [Discuss] Authentication and Authorization in Pulsar Manager

Hi Guangning, Overall looks good. I am looking forward for an example how can we create a read only role ? Can we please add an `read` action also into verb list ? On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, 12:40 PM Guangning E wrote: > Hi everyone, > The current pulsar-manager already supports basic JWT certificati

Re: [REVOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 non-binding On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 03:16, xiaolong ran wrote: > > Hello everyone: > > Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan > > > > About d

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 non binding On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 11:18, xiaolong ran wrote: > > Hi everyone > > Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose, > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan > > > as follows:

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Manager release 0.1.0 Candidate 2

+1 On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 05:28, Guangning E wrote: > > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 0.1.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > It fixes the following issues: >

Re: [Community Weekly Update] 2019-10-26 ~ 2019-11-01

Thank You anonymitaet On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 18:00, anonymitaet _ wrote: > > Dear Pulsar enthusiast, > > > > This is the weekly community update for 2019-10-26 ~ 2019-11-01, with updates > on new PIPs kicking in discussions of revisiting admin API and permissions, > introducing package managem

Re: Pulsar go admin client and pulsarctl

This is so awesome. Thanks for sharing streamnative team On Mon, Oct 28, 2019, 4:05 PM Yong Zhang wrote: > Hi Pulsar community, > > We just open sourced a Pulsar go admin client library and a CLI tool > `pulsarctl` built on top of it. If you are writing Golong applications to > interact with Pul

Re: [DISCUSS] Community Weekly Update

Excellent initiative. On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 14:25, anonymitaet _ wrote: > Hi Pulsar enthusiast, > > > > As we already noticed, the Pulsar community is growing rapidly, more and > more contributions coming from different parties. Meanwhile, plenty of > blogs, events, news about Pulsar are emergi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Penghui Li joins the Apache Pulsar PMC.

Congrats Penghui! On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 11:43, Jia Zhai wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Pulsar PMC, I am pleased to announce that Penghui > Li has already accepted our invitation to become a PMC member on the > Apache Pulsar project. > > Penghui has been actively contributing to Apache Pulsar

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-44: Separate schema compatibility checker for producer and consumer

Hi PengHui , Can we add support for this also https://github.com/confluentinc/schema-registry/pull/680 . Compatibility resolution strategy is right now at per topic level. For Event sourcing, we would like to have different types of event in the same topic with an AVRO name to each

Re: [VOTE] Accept pulsar-manager as part of Apache Pulsar project

+1 Thanks for the Wonderful Work On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 04:33, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a vote thread for accepting pulsar-manager [1] as part of > Apache Pulsar project. pulsar-manager is a new Pulsar web UI developed > using Vuejs and Springboot for managing multiple Pul

Re: PIP-40: Contribute Pulsar Manager

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 07:09, Sijie Guo wrote: > > I see there are dependencies on websockets, I would a prefer a simple > polling model of the http, also it's enable by default in pulsar. > > I don't think we depend don pulsar websocket. All are http restful > requests. > > > For the ui the defa

Re: PIP-40: Contribute Pulsar Manager

This is excellent. On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 17:19, Guangning E wrote: > Hi all, > > We have developed a new Pulsar web UI - pulsar-manager, aiming at > supporting managing Pulsar clusters running in different environments > (on-premise data centers, cloud, and so on). We’d like to contribute the >

Re: Major and Minor Release Management

renamed. > > Anyway, I am looking forward to see how other people think about this. > > - Sijie > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:57 PM Yuva raj wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Considering that we are facing issues in minor releases > *ex:* > > https://g

Re: Major and Minor Release Management

2.3.1. > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:49 AM Yuva raj wrote: > > > Hi Sijie, > > Are we going to do this for 2.3.1 release ? We need 2 of our pull request > > #3956 and #3840 to be merged in 2.3.1. If required we can go ahead and > > request to a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 2.3.1 released

Awesome Job Team! We will be going prod with 2.3.1. On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 21:17, Matteo Merli wrote: > The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 2.3.1. > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on > commodity hardware. It provides simple pub

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP 34: Add new subscribe type -- Key_Failover

On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 10:26, Jia Zhai wrote: > Thanks Penghui for the comments. > Seems Message Key is mostly used in such a case, and by this design, the > original protocol will no need too much change. > If you are afraid of broken other feature. I would like to add an item > “ordering_key” in

Re: Major and Minor Release Management

Hi Sijie, Are we going to do this for 2.3.1 release ? We need 2 of our pull request #3956 and #3840 to be merged in 2.3.1. If required we can go ahead and request to add cherry-pick/2.3.1 On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 23:35, Sijie Guo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:03 PM Ivan Kelly wrote: > > >

Re: Release 2.3.1 proposal

+1 On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 21:56, Matteo Merli wrote: > Since 2.3.0 we have fixed quite a few issues (84 changes merged > already). Some of these are blocking issues so we should release 2.3.1 > asap. > > I'll start merging back the commits from master to `branch-2.3`. > Please comment if there's

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 2.3.0 released

Congratulations Matteo! One of the most exciting and polished release! On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 00:57, Matteo Merli wrote: > The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 2.3.0. > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on > commodity hardware. It

Re: [DISCUSSION] Delayed message delivery

Considering the way pulsar is built +1 for doing PIP-26 in functions. I am more of thinking in a way like publish it pulsar we will make it available in a different queuing system if you need priority and delay messages support. Pulsar functions would go enough for this kind of use cases. On Fri,

Re: Pulsar 2.3.0 ...

e to pulsar, as things go, we can promote you as pulsar > committer and then you can help with pulsar releases. Hope that makes > sense. > > Sijie > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 4:35 AM Yuva raj wrote: > > > Hi Sijie, > > I would like volunteer. Let me know h

Re: Pulsar 2.3.0 ...

Hi Sijie, I would like volunteer. Let me know how to proceed. On Thu 27 Dec, 2018, 3:27 PM Sijie Guo Hi all, > > Anyone volunteers for being release manager of 2.3.0? > > I will be happy to help any committer who wants to try to do a release for > the first time. > > - Sijie >

Re: PIP-27: add checklist in github pull request template

Agree. For System like pulsar Documentation and Stability is far more important to gain large-scale adoption. On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 11:24, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > With the increase of contributions, more and more features are added pretty > quickly. > However, these features are either

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.2.1 Candidate 2

+1 On Fri 21 Dec, 2018, 1:14 AM Matteo Merli This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.2.1. > > It fixes the following issues: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/milestone/19?closed=1 > > *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay > open > for