Hi Yu Liu,
I am so happy to hear this.
+1
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 11:31, anonymitaet _ <anonymita...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Pulsarer,
>
>
>
> As we know, whether you are a Pulsar developer or user, it’s always important
> to have reliable documentation to guide our work.
>
>
>
> Recently, we are happy to see the time-based release plan has been accepted
> in our community. It advocates that docs are treated as important as codes
> and docs should be published when the software is released.
>
>
>
> I guess one of the best ways to try the time-based release plan is to apply
> it to Pulsar release. After major doc issues fixed, we can proceed to
> release, or else docs can be blockers for Pulsar release.
>
>
>
> (I and Jennifer volunteer as language reviewers and can help review doc PRs
> from the perspective of technical writing. If anyone would like to provide
> technical inputs, that is highly appreciated.)
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Yu Liu (@Anonymitaet)
--
Thanks
Yuvaraj L
