Considering the way pulsar is built +1 for doing PIP-26 in functions. I am more of thinking in a way like publish it pulsar we will make it available in a different queuing system if you need priority and delay messages support. Pulsar functions would go enough for this kind of use cases.
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 22:29, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: > > Correct. PIP-26 can be implemented in Functions. I believe the last > > discussion in PIP-26 thread kind of agree on functions approach. > > If the community is okay with PIP-26 in functions, I think that is > probably > > a good approach to start. > > +1 for doing it in functions. > > -Ivan > -- *Thanks* *Yuvaraj L*
