+1

On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 17:42, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Personally I think we should create the first release as early as possible.
> This would allow more people starting using the native go client. We can
> take more feedback from people when they start using it. We can add a note
> that the current release version is "developer preview" and warn people
> that the API is subject to change in the future.
>
> It is just my 2 cents.
>
> Thanks,
> Sijie
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:33 AM xiaolong ran <ranxiaolong...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, agree with you. Maybe we can plan what features we need
> > to implement in the first release. and accelerate the release
> > process of pulsar-client-go.
> >
> > --
> > Thanks
> > Xiaolong Ran
> >
> >
> > > 在 2019年12月18日,上午2:45,Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > >
> > > There are still a number of critical pieces of the Go client library
> > > that are being worked on.
> > > Before these get settled we should avoid making a release that will
> > > settle the API and the semantics.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matteo Merli
> > > <matteo.me...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 6:01 AM Guangning E <eguangn...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> That sounds good to me, a stable version of native go client is
> > important.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Guangning
> > >>
> > >> xiaolong ran <ranxiaolong...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月17日周二 下午9:15写道:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all committers:
> > >>>
> > >>> Since the [pulsar-client-go](
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go <
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go>) repo has
> > >>> been transferred to the ASF under Pulsar PMC, I would suggest us
> > creating
> > >>> the
> > >>> first pulsar-client-go apache release as soon as possible. So that we
> > can
> > >>> identify
> > >>> what to release and what are the potential issues to fix to follow the
> > >>> Apache way.
> > >>>
> > >>> This is the email thread for discussing the first pulsar-client-go
> > release.
> > >>> Please chime in with your thoughts.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regarding,
> > >>> Xiaolong Ran
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> >



-- 
Thanks

Yuvaraj L

Reply via email to