Sounds good.
Ethan
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 18:40, Jesse Gross wrote:
> I was planning on looking at it.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> I was hoping that you and Jesse could work out who has precedence.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:56:14PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
I was planning on looking at it.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I was hoping that you and Jesse could work out who has precedence.
>
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:56:14PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Who is the appropriate person to review this? If it's me, how urgent is it?
I was hoping that you and Jesse could work out who has precedence.
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:56:14PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Who is the appropriate person to review this? If it's me, how urgent is it?
>
> Ethan
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 16:44, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011
Who is the appropriate person to review this? If it's me, how urgent is it?
Ethan
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 16:44, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:43:12PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> The Netlink flow key attribute structure is designed to allow the
>> kernel to add support for new pro
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:43:12PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The Netlink flow key attribute structure is designed to allow the
> kernel to add support for new protocols over time without breaking
> userspace applications, but the userspace side of this had not been
> implemented. This series imple
