I was planning on looking at it.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > I was hoping that you and Jesse could work out who has precedence. > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:56:14PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> Who is the appropriate person to review this? If it's me, how urgent is it? >> >> Ethan >> >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 16:44, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:43:12PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> >> The Netlink flow key attribute structure is designed to allow the >> >> kernel to add support for new protocols over time without breaking >> >> userspace applications, but the userspace side of this had not been >> >> implemented. ?This series implements it. >> >> >> >> I already have some proposed changes out that would specify rules for >> >> changing the kernel flow key format over time: >> >> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2011-November/012588.html. ?Those >> >> rules would change the existing kernel flow key format a bit. ?This commit >> >> doesn't depend on or implement those changes. >> > >> > Also, I tested an earlier form of this series, but I haven't re-tested >> > the final version that I posted. ?Obviously that would be necessary >> > before I commit it. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > dev mailing list >> > dev@openvswitch.org >> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
