I was hoping that you and Jesse could work out who has precedence.
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:56:14PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > Who is the appropriate person to review this? If it's me, how urgent is it? > > Ethan > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 16:44, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:43:12PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> The Netlink flow key attribute structure is designed to allow the > >> kernel to add support for new protocols over time without breaking > >> userspace applications, but the userspace side of this had not been > >> implemented. ?This series implements it. > >> > >> I already have some proposed changes out that would specify rules for > >> changing the kernel flow key format over time: > >> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2011-November/012588.html. ?Those > >> rules would change the existing kernel flow key format a bit. ?This commit > >> doesn't depend on or implement those changes. > > > > Also, I tested an earlier form of this series, but I haven't re-tested > > the final version that I posted. ?Obviously that would be necessary > > before I commit it. > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > dev@openvswitch.org > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
