Sounds good. Ethan
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 18:40, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: > I was planning on looking at it. > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> I was hoping that you and Jesse could work out who has precedence. >> >> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:56:14PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >>> Who is the appropriate person to review this? If it's me, how urgent is it? >>> >>> Ethan >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 16:44, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >>> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:43:12PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >>> >> The Netlink flow key attribute structure is designed to allow the >>> >> kernel to add support for new protocols over time without breaking >>> >> userspace applications, but the userspace side of this had not been >>> >> implemented. ?This series implements it. >>> >> >>> >> I already have some proposed changes out that would specify rules for >>> >> changing the kernel flow key format over time: >>> >> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2011-November/012588.html. ?Those >>> >> rules would change the existing kernel flow key format a bit. ?This >>> >> commit >>> >> doesn't depend on or implement those changes. >>> > >>> > Also, I tested an earlier form of this series, but I haven't re-tested >>> > the final version that I posted. ?Obviously that would be necessary >>> > before I commit it. >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > dev mailing list >>> > dev@openvswitch.org >>> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> dev@openvswitch.org >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
