Re: ia2 Buildbot needs attention

On 11.11.2013 11:12, Steve Yin wrote: Based on Herbert suggestion, I will synchronize the branch with the latest trunk. And the build issue will go away. :) Thanks for synchronizing with trunk! That solved the problem, the ia2 builds are successful again and the install packages are available

How can I know that this file effects save/export feature ?

I want to especially be part of developement activity in save/export. for that matter, i've been reading QA bugs on bugzilla but what i want to know (for ease) that how can i know that which file or which part of file effects save/export features in svn ? If anyone can give hint, please provide. T

Re: Time to think about a "Language Update" release?

On 11/12/13 4:48 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Nov 11, 2013 6:37 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: >> >> On 11/10/13 8:06 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ricardo Berlasso >>> wrote: >>> 2013/11/3 Keith N. McKenna >>> Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Comparing http://www.

Re: Call for Automation BVT volunteer for AOO4.1

Hi,all Because Build update for synchronize ia2 branch with the latest trunk , So make BVT for 410m1(Build:9750) (en-US) Rev 1540658 BVT result : All 22 testcases , Pass 22, Fail 0, Error 0 , Ignored 0 The detailed info

Re: Build braker in rejuvenate01 cppu

Hi Raphael, On 11.11.2013 10:47, Raphael Bircher wrote: I run in a build breaker in the rejuvenate01 branche dmake: Error: -- `uno_purpenvhelpers5abi.map' not found, and can't be made I just committed r1540968 to add the missing file by renaming its older cousin. Has someone a idea what

Re: [Accessibility] IA2 Integration proposal

Hi, I use Windows XP Pro, and now I am working on r1540658. regsvr2.exe /U UAccCOM.dl says: module not found. How should I register oleacc.dll and oleaut32.dll? Is it relevant on XP (the bug you mention seems to be on W7). Regards, Le 11/11/2013 14:43, V Stuart Foote a écrit : Jean-P

Re: Time to start 4.1 planning?

2013/11/12 Rob Weir > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Marcus (OOo) > wrote: > > Am 11/11/2013 04:12 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: > > > >> On 11/11/13 3:59 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Shenfeng Liu > wrote: > > Hi, all, > It was one month sin

Re: Fwd: Re: Re : [Call For QA Volunteers][Accessibility] AOO IAccessible2 testing work

Hi, My experience with bugs trackers and Windows world isn't very big, so I submit you my situation to see if everything is good. Now I have an account on the bug tracker. Is it enough or should I add myself to something? How can I do this while logged in? Thanks for your answer. Regards,

Request For improvement

Hi my name is Mohammed Rizwan This email is concerning the Open Office I am currently studying in the University of Bolton and I have chosen this software to have a look at Their is one problem which I realized when I was using this software which is that when a large file is opened the softwar

Re: [OS2] gcc 4.7.3, CPPULIB now required for some modules

Hi Herbert, > Did you change the linker too? When linux distributions switched from > the "bfd" to the "gold" linker there where problems that libraries that > were only linked indirectly had to be mentioned directly [1] OS/2 does not use ld to link object files. But this seems not the problem

Re: [OS2] gcc 4.7.3, CPPULIB now required for some modules

Hi Yuri, On 12.11.2013 12:37, Yuri Dario wrote: Did you change the linker too? When linux distributions switched from the "bfd" to the "gold" linker there where problems that libraries that were only linked indirectly had to be mentioned directly [1] OS/2 does not use ld to link object files.

XML files are binary?

I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is correctly set to application/xml. Does anybody know why they are still flagged as binary?

Re: XML files are binary?

Hi, On 12.11.2013 14:59, Andre Fischer wrote: I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is correctly set to application/xml. Does anybody

Re: Request For improvement

Hi Rizwan Mohammed, If you have a good will, that will be great! Also, next problem is present when open some big file: it takes to long. Regards, Wlada 2013/11/12 Rizwan Mohammed > Hi > my name is Mohammed Rizwan > This email is concerning the Open Office > I am currently studying in the U

Re: XML files are binary?

On 11/12/13 2:59 PM, Andre Fischer wrote: > I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work > is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. > Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is correctly set > to application/xml. Does anybo

Re: XML files are binary?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is > not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. > Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is correctly set to > application/xml.

Re: XML files are binary?

On 12.11.2013 15:19, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is c

Re: Interested in a technical cross-platform mailing?

...Does that bottom part mean this mailing list is subscribed to his mailing list? Don On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:54 PM, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe < mengualjean...@free.fr> wrote: > Hi, We have just founded a group, called liberte0 (Freedom 0). Its purpose > is to promote the accessibility for every

Re: XML files are binary?

On 12.11.2013 15:34, Andre Fischer wrote: On 12.11.2013 15:19, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. Checking their pr

Re: XML files are binary?

On 12.11.2013 14:59, Andre Fischer wrote: I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is correctly set to application/xml. Does anybody know

Re: XML files are binary?

On 12.11.2013 15:54, Herbert Duerr wrote: On 12.11.2013 14:59, Andre Fischer wrote: I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is correctly

Re: XML files are binary?

On 12 November 2013 14:59, Andre Fischer wrote: > I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is > not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. > Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is correctly set > to application/xml. Do

Re: XML files are binary?

On 12 November 2013 15:54, Herbert Duerr wrote: > On 12.11.2013 14:59, Andre Fischer wrote: > >> I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work >> is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary. >> Checking their properties revealed that their mime

[proposal] GIT mirror

Hi. based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard) We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra) We can switch completely to GIT (whic

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts > comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). > > We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard) > > We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction f

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote: >> Hi. >> >> based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts >> comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). >> >> We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (stand

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard) We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra) We can

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 12 November 2013 17:02, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jürgen Schmidt > wrote: > > On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote: > >> Hi. > >> > >> based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts > >> comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist)

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 12 November 2013 16:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote: > > Hi. > > > > based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts > > comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). > > > > We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (stand

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 11/12/13 5:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jürgen Schmidt > wrote: >> On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts >>> comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). >>> >>> We

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: >> based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts >> comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). >> >> We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard) >> >> We cannot have

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 12 November 2013 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > > On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: > >> based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts > >> comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). > >> > >> We can have a

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 12.11.2013 17:06, janI wrote: On 12 November 2013 16:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote: Hi. based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror ver

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 11/12/13 5:24 PM, janI wrote: > On 12 November 2013 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: >>> On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra gi

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 12 November 2013 17:32, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 11/12/13 5:24 PM, janI wrote: > > On 12 November 2013 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > >> On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > >>> On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: > based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and h

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 11/12/13 5:37 PM, janI wrote: > On 12 November 2013 17:32, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 11/12/13 5:24 PM, janI wrote: >>> On 12 November 2013 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: >> based on the discussion

Re: Time to think about a "Language Update" release?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 11/12/13 4:48 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2013 6:37 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: > >> > >> On 11/10/13 8:06 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ricardo Berlasso > >>> wrote: > >>> > 2013/11/3 Keith

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

Herbert Duerr wrote: On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: @herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ? I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now. And what would be the advantage for real contributors in having a read-only GIT mirror? The com

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Herbert Duerr wrote: >> >> On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: >>> >>> @herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ? >> >> I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now. > > > And what would be

Re: Updated migration guide?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Rob Weir wrote: >> I'm thinking of starting to create an updated migration guide for >> AOO. If you have any thoughts on this, or want to help, let me >> know. >> >> Target audience inclu

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 12 November 2013 20:12, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > > Herbert Duerr wrote: > >> > >> On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: > >>> > >>> @herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ? > >> > >> I have reopened the JIRA issue an

Re: Time to think about a "Language Update" release?

On 11/11/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I we can complete at least 5 languages until end of Nov. we can make language update only. Means we will release only this new languages on the AOO401 branch + a new source release. The same as we did for 3.4.1 where we released 12 new languages. Thank you, m

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

Am 11/12/2013 08:24 PM, schrieb janI: On 12 November 2013 20:12, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Herbert Duerr wrote: On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: @herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ? I have reopened the JIRA i

Re: Time to start 4.1 planning?

Am 11/11/2013 10:33 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 11/11/2013 04:12 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: On 11/11/13 3:59 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote: Hi, all, It was one month since 4.0.1 release. And

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

Am 11/12/2013 08:12 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Herbert Duerr wrote: On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: @herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ? I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for

Re: Time to start 4.1 planning?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 11/11/2013 10:33 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Marcus (OOo) >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 11/11/2013 04:12 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>> On 11/11/13 3:59 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 11/12/2013 08:12 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti >> wrote: >>> >>> Herbert Duerr wrote: On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: > > > @herbert, if nobody objects will you reope

Re: [Proposal] Update 'Get It Here' Banner

Hey Everyone, I want to have "Get It Here" translated so that I can provide banners for each language, this will help our fans promote us in their markets in their own language with little effort on their part. ie. /images/get-it-here/en.png /images/get-it-here/fr.png /images/get-it-here/de.png e

Re: Updated migration guide?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > I'm thinking of starting to create an updated migration guide for AOO. > If you have any thoughts on this, or want to help, let me know. > Excellent idea, it's in need of it, especially around network installs and network wide customisations.

Re: [Proposal] Update 'Get It Here' Banner

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Samer Mansour wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > I want to have "Get It Here" translated so that I can provide banners for > each language, this will help our fans promote us in their markets in their > own language with little effort on their part. > > ie. > /images/get-i

Re: [Proposal] Update 'Get It Here' Banner

This will be a one time need, I will contact the L10N list for now. Thanks that's good advice. I did have an idea earlier in the summer to incorporate pootle into a oo.o website design, that is to follow my icon proposal. The oo.o website is my next priority. Throwing a date out, I can see it co

Swiss Testing Night

Hi at all Tomorrow evening I will attend a QA Event in Zurich (Switzerland) The Event is not Open Source specific but byside some interesting talks from Microsoft and Google employees about performance it will be a load of room for personal talks and networking. The Venue is the famos Google

Re: Updated migration guide?

I think that you can do this using the move tab, you can rename that and the subpages as well although that's not a copy per se. I'll see what I can do, just may have to revert, if it all turns to custard tarts Cheers GL On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013

Re: Updated migration guide?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Rob Weir wrote: > >> I'm thinking of starting to create an updated migration guide for > >> AOO. If you have any thoughts on

Re: [code] solution for issue 33737 - in-place editing of Input Fields

On 07/11/2013 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: I am working on a solution for issue 33737 [1] and I am making good progress. I have started the documentation of the solution in our wiki - please have a look at https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/Input_Fields This is a nice usability improvemen

Re: Updated migration guide?

I'm getting a 502 Proxy error on the mwiki, edits aren't taking On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Graham Lauder wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna >> wrote: >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > Hash: S

Media Wiki Proxy Error

I'm having issues editing the Media wiki, I keep getting a 502 error. Everything works up 'til the "submit" process. Error as follows: Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request POST /w/index.php. Reason: Er

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) > wrote: > > Am 11/12/2013 08:12 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > > >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Herbert Duerr wrote: > > > On 12.11.2013 16:48,

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

Am 11/12/2013 10:38 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 11/12/2013 08:12 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Herbert Duerr wrote: On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: @herbert, if nobody objects will you r

Re: Time to start 4.1 planning?

Am 11/12/2013 10:36 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 11/11/2013 10:33 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 11/11/2013 04:12 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: On 11/11/13 3:59 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Nov

Re: Updated migration guide?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Graham Lauder wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir > wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna >> wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: > I'm thinking of starting to create an updated migration > guide for AOO. If you h

Re: Updated migration guide?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Graham Lauder wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna >>> wrote: >> Rob Weir wrote: >> I'm thinking of

Re: Updated migration guide?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Graham Lauder wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna > >> wrote: > > Ro

buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

Regarding Jürgen's comments on a recent thread -- http://markmail.org/message/v5zli2np67qv5ryz Since CentOS 5 is our reference distribution for delivered Linux binaries (I did not know this!) -- and I am assuming this distro might remain as the reference going forward, does it make sense to try

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole thing done without academics interfering with the work. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013

Re: Updated migration guide?

Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > Graham Lauder wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: Rob Weir wrote: I'm thinking of starting to creat

Re: Updated migration guide?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Graham Lauder wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM,

Re: Updated migration guide?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna > > wrote: > > Graham Lauder wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Rob Weir > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Keith N. McKenna >

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

2013/11/11 Ian Lynch > Apache Open Office is not Microsoft Office. We make it as compatible as we > possibly can but since MS does not tell us exactly how it organises its > data that is not always easy. I don't think anyone has ever claimed > OpenOffice to be able to provide complex MS documents

Re: Time to start 4.1 planning?

I just updated the 4.1 planning wiki[1]: (1) I added the section of "Proposed Release Schedule", including the beta. But I left most of the milestones . (2) I created a wiki page of "AOO Feature Enhancement Backlog"[2], and left only those active items (per my reading from the dev list) in 4.1, but

Re: Media Wiki Proxy Error

2013/11/13 Graham Lauder > I'm having issues editing the Media wiki, I keep getting a 502 error. > > Everything works up 'til the "submit" process. > > Error as follows: > > > Proxy Error > > The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. > The proxy server could not handl

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On Nov 13, 2013 12:45 AM, "Marcus (OOo)" wrote: > > Am 11/12/2013 10:38 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: >> >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>> >>> Am 11/12/2013 08:12 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: >>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > Herber

Re: [code] solution for issue 33737 - in-place editing of Input Fields

Hi Andrea, try to insert a Tab into a writer texttable cell, you have to use CTRL-TAB. Regards Peter Am 13.11.2013 00:21, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 07/11/2013 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: I am working on a solution for issue 33737 [1] and I am making good progress. I have started the docume

Re: [proposal] GIT mirror

On 12.11.2013 20:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Herbert Duerr wrote: On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: @herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ? I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now. And what would be the advantage for real contributo