On 11/12/13 5:37 PM, janI wrote: > On 12 November 2013 17:32, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 11/12/13 5:24 PM, janI wrote: >>> On 12 November 2013 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: >>>>> On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote: >>>>>> based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts >>>>>> comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist). >>>>>> >>>>>> We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard) >>>>>> >>>>>> We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra) >>>>>> >>>>>> We can switch completely to GIT (which I for one would be against). >>>>>> >>>>>> I recommend to reopen ticket 5590 with a comment asking for a >> read/only >>>>>> mirror. Jfarrell is right now (this week) working through git issues, >>>>>> so if >>>>>> we can reopen the ticket fast, I can help jfarrell make this happen >>>> fast. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for this interesting info. This makes it clear that we should >> act >>>>> ASAP. >>>>> >>>>>> @herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ? >>>>> >>>>> I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for >> now. >>>> >>>> I am not sure why should we proceed with a read-only mirror if we decide >>>> to switch completely >>>> >>> >>> I think that is a bigger decision. it would also mean that f.x. the >> pootle >>> workflow would have to be done differently. >>> >>> Having a git readonly mirror for a period of time, allows us to see how >> it >>> works, change workflows, and see if there are user acceptance. >> >> I believe the majority of active developers work today with git-svn >> already. It would simplify the daily work :-) >> >> I will not being a show-stopper for a complete switch. I found it more > secure to do it stepwise. > > And I am sure with the suggestion from andre, I can manage the switch too > :-) > > >> Regarding the Pootle workflow I am not sure if I understand it >> currently. Would it be a big change to git instead svn? And if yes why >> and would it be really a blocker? >> > > pootle does not git only svn, meaning we will not be able to commit > directly from pootle. > > No this is no blocker just inconvenient for the pootle admins, who then > still need to work on the vm.
thinking about a cron job doing it automatic at well defined time slots or so... just thinking Juergen > > rgds > jan I. > > >> Juergen >> >>> >>> rgds >>> jan I. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Juergen >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Herbert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
