Re: Test for unsubscribe link

It's in the headers. All apache.org lists are like that. On 29/12/2012 16:03, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Junge wrote: There's indeed no unsubscribe link coming with my email. Does anyone know if this is intended or is it a bug? I can't find any older messages to ooo-dev that include an uns

Re: Test for unsubscribe link

On 12/30/2012 4:37 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote: It's in the headers. All apache.org lists are like that. Yes, I noticed that, but with OpenOffice we need to consider that it's an end user software, so we have typical end users subscribed to our mailing list, especially with users@. These guys

Draft: Guidelines for redistributing (an original) Apache OpenOffice with 3rd party bundles (e.g. books or template packages)

Hi, from time to time there are requests to bundle OpenOffice with 3rd party products. A typical case is that a publishing house wants to release a commercial box in which they bundle an original version of Apache OpenOffice with a handbook (either printed or electronic) and some goodies like

Re: Draft: Guidelines for redistributing (an original) Apache OpenOffice with 3rd party bundles (e.g. books or template packages)

+1, I would add a line saying something: In no case are such distributions allowed without the written consensus of Apache OpenOffice. That will make it easier to pursue a case, if someone just distributes. I would also suggest, we add a link to the distribution guideline, so one can claim "I did

Endnote/Index in Writer

On the en-Forum it has just been pointed out to me that Endnotes place themselves at the End of a document; this prevents an alphabetical Index being placed there, which is the usual location for it. Perhaps this should be considered for alteration in a forthcoming revision of Writer. -- Ror

Re: Draft: Guidelines for redistributing (an original) Apache OpenOffice with 3rd party bundles (e.g. books or template packages)

On 12/30/2012 06:32, janI wrote: +1, I would add a line saying something: In no case are such distributions allowed without the written consensus of Apache OpenOffice. That will make it easier to pursue a case, if someone just distributes. I would also suggest, we add a link to the distribution

Re: Endnote/Index in Writer

On 12/30/2012 07:11, Rory O'Farrell wrote: On the en-Forum it has just been pointed out to me that Endnotes place themselves at the End of a document; this prevents an alphabetical Index being placed there, which is the usual location for it. Perhaps this should be considered for alteration

Re: old business...old OpenOffice domain names registered by Oracle (primarily)

On 02/11/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote: Actually these domains are still there: I tested 5 random ones from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4906 and as Dave wrote they appear to have been (auto)renewed. They do not resolve, but WHOIS shows that they still exist and still belong to Oracle

Re: Endnote/Index in Writer

2012/12/30 TJ Frazier > On 12/30/2012 07:11, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >> >> On the en-Forum it has just been pointed out to me that Endnotes place >> themselves at the End of a document; this prevents an alphabetical Index >> being placed there, which is the usual location for it. Perhaps this >>

Re: [RELEASE] Respin snapshot builds for early verification available

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > before I go on Christmas vacation I have built snapshots for our > upcoming AOO 3.4.1 respin to support further languages. > > I create a build for Danish, Swedish, Polish, Norwegian Bokmal, Scottish > Gaelic and Korean. > > Juergen

Re: [RELEASE] Respin snapshot builds for early verification available

Jeongkyu Kim wrote: Fortunately, Korean translation was completed in time. Would you let me know how can I submit the po files? To follow the standard procedure, you should attach the zipped PO files to this issue I've just created: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121559 (you wi

Re: Endnote/Index in Writer

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:00:46 -0500 TJ Frazier wrote: > On 12/30/2012 07:11, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > > On the en-Forum it has just been pointed out to me that Endnotes place > > themselves at the End of a document; this prevents an alphabetical Index > > being placed there, which is the usua

Re: Draft: Guidelines for redistributing (an original) Apache OpenOffice with 3rd party bundles (e.g. books or template packages)

On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Peter Junge wrote: > Hi, > > from time to time there are requests to bundle OpenOffice with 3rd party > products. A typical case is that a publishing house wants to release a > commercial box in which they bundle an original version of Apache OpenOffice > with a ha

Re: Windows 8 compatibility

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:59 PM, F C. Costero wrote: > There is a steady stream of questions on the Google Questions list about > AOO compatibility with Windows 8. Some mention a problem with installation > and others merely ask if AOO will work on that OS. No details of the > installation problem

Re: 30 million downloads, year end blog post

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Donald Harbison wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> Just noticed that we hit the 30 million download mark for AOO 3.4 on >> December 22nd. >> >> That is a nice, round number. Maybe we should do a year end blog >> post, summarizing our

Re: Test for unsubscribe link

On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Peter Junge wrote: > On 12/30/2012 4:37 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote: >> >> It's in the headers. All apache.org lists are like that. > > > Yes, I noticed that, but with OpenOffice we need to consider that it's an > end user software, so we have typical end users subs

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

Hi Regina; - Messaggio originale - > Da: Regina Henschel  > > A > Implementation of FDIST as defined in ODF1.2 > > The function FDIST (part 2, 6.18.22) calculates the left tail (integral from > 0 > to x). The function LEGACY.FDIST (part 2, 6.18.23) calculates the right tail > (integ

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi Regina; > > > - Messaggio originale - >> Da: Regina Henschel > >> >> A >> Implementation of FDIST as defined in ODF1.2 >> >> The function FDIST (part 2, 6.18.22) calculates the left tail (integral from >> 0 >> to x). The function L

Re: 30 million downloads, year end blog post

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:00 PM, janI wrote: > @Rob: > > google analytics was "lost in translation" on wiki, it should be back now. > > If you goto wiki.opensource.org, and edit page source, you should see the > link to google_analytics. > > Sorry for mssing that feature, > > Can you please check

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

- Messaggio originale - > Da: Rob Weir  ... >> >> BTW, I am considering doing something drastic there, like replacing all the > probability >> distributions with with boost implementations. Would there be any good > reason to >> avoid such approach? >> > > What is the advantage of

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

Improved accuracy its usually a good thing. I have considered that boost was a good choice so that our will not be system dependent. in other words, i think it is a good idea. Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G Pedro Giffuni wrote: - Messaggio originale - > Da: Rob Weir  ... >> >>  BTW,

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > - Messaggio originale - >> Da: Rob Weir > ... >>> >>> BTW, I am considering doing something drastic there, like replacing all the >> probability >>> distributions with with boost implementations. Would there be any good >> reaso

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

- Messaggio originale - > Da: Rob Weir  ... >> >> Please feel free to contribute a spreadsheet that calculates the edge >> cases. Any contribution of that kind is welcome, and that's why this > list >> exists. >> > > Well, what does boost use for its own testing?  They must do some

Re: Windows 8 compatibility

I've been using Windows 8 since Oct 30, and I am also using Apache OpenOffice and I haven't had any problems so far. Of course I didn't have to install OpenOffice because I already had version 3.4.1 when I installed Win 8. So I can say there is no problem using AOO on Win 8 but I can't say anyt

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

Hi Pedro, Pedro Giffuni schrieb: Hi Regina; - Messaggio originale - Da: Regina Henschel A Implementation of FDIST as defined in ODF1.2 The function FDIST (part 2, 6.18.22) calculates the left tail (integral from 0 to x). The function LEGACY.FDIST (part 2, 6.18.23) calculates the

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

Hi Regina; - Messaggio originale - > Da: Regina Henschel  ... > > I have no solution for this problem. >  I see.. In theory I am rather busy but I find time to do two or three things at a time ;) There is no need to hurry this type of things for 4.0. >> >> BTW, I am considering doin

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

If the change is made, a good first step is a spread sheet with test cases. So you have a proposed list of functions that would be changed? Would want too compare expected group actual and old to new. Would want to devise test cases against both common and edge cases.  Also curios about time im

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

Hi Andrew; - Messaggio originale - > Da: Andrew Pitonyak  > > If the change is made, a good first step is a spread sheet with test cases. > > So you have a proposed list of functions that would be changed? >  I did just a very small set of changes for asinh, acosh, atanh and a some in

Presentation for Apache Asia Roadshow 2012 Beijing is available (was: Presentation file under ALv2)

Peter, Thanks very much to consolidate the slides with Apache license! I added the link in the Events Calendar wiki . - Shenfeng (Simon) 2012/12/29 Peter Junge > On 12/27/2012 4:10 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> Yes Apache

Re: Windows 8 compatibility

Hi, Windows 8 was not officially released yet when AOO 3.4.1 was released. But we tested with the preview version of Windows 8 and AOO 3.4.1 appeared to work well. So the question might be: what level of testing do we require before listing Windows 8 as "supported"? The question is: Do