Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 19.05.20 um 19:44 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, all, >>> >>> Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis: On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seide

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Don, Am 19.05.20 um 19:44 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, all, >> >> Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Don, Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Don, > > Am 18.05.20 um 01:2

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, all, > > Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Don, Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: > Looks like someone applied this p

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Don, all, Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port: --- solenv/g

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port: >>> >>> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig 2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC >>> +++ sole

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Don, Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Don, > > Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: >> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port: >> >> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig 2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC >> +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk >> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(st

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hello team, FYI this issue still present since 4.1.5 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127646 Cruel issue - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffi

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Don, Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis: > > Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port: > > --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig 2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC > +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1) > $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

On 16 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 15.05.20 um 21:30 schrieb Don Lewis: >> >> Nope. I am able to build AOO420 git revision d12e928220 from late >> January using gmake 4.3. > > Have there been significant changes to the build system in the past 4 month? > Maybe you could try it wi

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 18.05.20 um 00:37 schrieb Marcus: Am 17.05.20 um 12:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 17.05.20 um 12:25 schrieb Marcus: Don't panic, you do not need to be a software engineer or programmer though those skills are always needed. 2 x need(ed)... I would rather write: ...  though those skills

Re: macOS and AOO42X

On 5/17/2020 3:29 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 17.05.20 um 23:13 schrieb Brian Barker: At 16:55 17/05/2020 -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote: The Apache® OpenOffice® Projekt is on the road to a bigger update for its leading open source office suite. The changes look good except that its should be eith

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 17.05.20 um 12:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 17.05.20 um 12:25 schrieb Marcus: Don't panic, you do not need to be a software engineer or programmer though those skills are always needed. 2 x need(ed)... I would rather write: ...  though those skills are always helpful. or ...  though t

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 17.05.20 um 23:13 schrieb Brian Barker: At 16:55 17/05/2020 -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote: The Apache® OpenOffice® Projekt is on the road to a bigger update for its leading open source office suite. The changes look good except that its should be either it is or it's it would probably be b

Re: macOS and AOO42X

At 16:55 17/05/2020 -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote: The Apache® OpenOffice® Projekt is on the road to a bigger update for its leading open source office suite. The changes look good except that its should be either it is or it's it would probably be better to use it is rather than the contract

Re: macOS and AOO42X

On 5/17/2020 5:56 AM, Marcus wrote: > Am 12.05.20 um 03:47 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> As promised here is a draft for a high level blog post. It is rough so >> please feel free to edit to your hearts content or to make any >> suggestions. >> >> Would you like to help with the development of the l

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Brian, all > Aaargh, no! The possessive pronoun is "its", not "it's". Stet. You are absolutely correct. My bad! Sorry! Fortunately Marcus replaced its by the ;) Cheers, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openof

Re: macOS and AOO42X

At 11:19 17/05/2020 +0100, Pedro Lino wrote: Some corrections/suggestions The Apache® OpenOffice® Projekt is on the road to a bigger update for its leading open source office suite. [...]; it's not its Aaargh, no! The possessive pronoun is "its", not "it's". Stet. Brian Barker

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Marcus, all, Am 17.05.20 um 12:25 schrieb Marcus: > Don't panic, you do not need to be a software engineer or programmer > though those skills are always needed. 2 x need(ed)... I would rather write: ...  though those skills are always helpful. or ...  though those skills are always welcom

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 17.05.20 um 12:19 schrieb Pedro Lino: Some corrections/suggestions The Apache® OpenOffice® Projekt is on the road to a bigger update for its leading open source office suite. Project not Projekt; it's not its and not German ;-) It's enough when you just install the software and test it

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Marcus, all Some corrections/suggestions > The Apache® OpenOffice® Projekt is on the road to a bigger update for > its leading open source office suite. Project not Projekt; it's not its > It's enough when you > just install the software and test it for quality, reliability, language > t

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 12.05.20 um 03:47 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: As promised here is a draft for a high level blog post. It is rough so please feel free to edit to your hearts content or to make any suggestions. Would you like to help with the development of the leading open source office suite? This is your chan

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Don, Am 15.05.20 um 21:30 schrieb Don Lewis: > > Nope. I am able to build AOO420 git revision d12e928220 from late > January using gmake 4.3. Have there been significant changes to the build system in the past 4 month? Maybe you could try it with a more recent revision... Regards,    Matthi

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 15.05.20 um 17:14 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis: On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In the meantime,

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Don, Am 15.05.20 um 17:14 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) >>> Thanks, I think we need it for A

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Don, Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis: > On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or >>> later) >> Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too. >> >> At least I had to downgrade

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) > > Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too. > > At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin... gmake 4.3 isn't broken everywhere. FreeBS

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Jim, I think we are complete? Am 13.05.20 um 19:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > From what I can see, builds are starting to to fill in... > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

From what I can see, builds are starting to to fill in... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Gotcha... before I do it I'll try w/ 4.3.0 and see if there are any diffs between the makefiles > On May 11, 2020, at 5:58 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) > > Thanks,

Re: macOS and AOO42X

>> >> Regards >> Keith >> > Sorry about the delay with the death of my father-in-law I have been > babysitting the kids as my wife is with her mother going through the > legal rigamarole that has to be taken care of and my daughter is working > so I have the kids. Needless to say trying to think s

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too. At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin... > > - > To unsubscr

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

According to the gmake 4.3 release docs: * WARNING: Backward-incompatibility! Number signs (#) appearing inside a macro reference or function invocation no longer introduce comments and should not be escaped with backslashes: thus a call such as: foo := $(shell echo '#') is legal. Pre

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Thanks I see https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128373 now. this needs to be fixed before our next release :/ > On May 11, 2020, at 4:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> It is, yes. >

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > It is, yes. Downgrade to 4.2. That should fix it. The same on Linux and Windows (Cygwin) I am telling it to this list for weeks now... ;-) > >> On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Let me guess... >> >> make is updated to 4.

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

It is, yes. > On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Let me guess... > > make is updated to 4.3? > > Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on >> macOS): >> >> = >> Building module

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Let me guess... make is updated to 4.3? Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on > macOS): > > = > Building module offapi > = > > Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj > > cd .. &

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on macOS): = Building module offapi = Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj cd .. && make -s -r -j6 && make -s -r deliverlog [ build RDB ] offapi [ build HPP ] offapi [ build CHK ] loa

Re: macOS and AOO42X

On 5/4/2020 4:49 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > On 5/4/2020 1:27 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 04.05.20 um 19:16 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> On 5/4/2020 11:40 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Keith, Hi Matthias Comments in line Am 04.05.20 um 17:30 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On 5/4/2020

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Am 11.05.20 um 20:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Tag is done: > > 420-Dev2-m2 > > Kicking off builds Great! Do you build the 5 additional languages? > >> On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> 420-Dev2-m2 > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Tag is done: 420-Dev2-m2 Kicking off builds > On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > 420-Dev2-m2

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Jim, Matthias > Any chance you (Jim) can share a regular test build of branch 4.2 for > Linux x64 (after the official Dev2)? > >>> That's up to Jim. Our buildbots produce builds, but they are on Ubuntu... > >> Yes, I do hope he considers my request. The buildbot versions do not > >>

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Jim, Am 11.05.20 um 16:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On May 10, 2020, at 5:13 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: >> >> Hi Matthias, Jim >> >>> To be honest, there are still enough issues to fix... But I thought it >>> would be time for a little bit of fun! ;-) >>> >>> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/abou

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Jim, Am 11.05.20 um 16:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > With the somewhat successful tests, I will tag HEAD/trunk of the 42X branch > as 420-Dev2-m2 (420m2) sometime today or tomorrow and start on the Linux > 32&64 and macOS builds. I am on standby for the Windows builds... ;-) > -

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

With the somewhat successful tests, I will tag HEAD/trunk of the 42X branch as 420-Dev2-m2 (420m2) sometime today or tomorrow and start on the Linux 32&64 and macOS builds. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apa

Re: macOS and AOO42X

> On May 10, 2020, at 5:13 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Matthias, Jim > >> To be honest, there are still enough issues to fix... But I thought it >> would be time for a little bit of fun! ;-) >> >> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/about.png > > I agree. Personally I think that aside from ta

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Matthias, Jim > To be honest, there are still enough issues to fix... But I thought it > would be time for a little bit of fun! ;-) > > https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/about.png I agree. Personally I think that aside from taking advantage of the "4 ever" expression, I would not mind if we k

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Pedro, Am 09.05.20 um 23:15 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi all > > >> On May 7, 2020 7:46 PM Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> >> My local Windows build was successful. All issues with language files >> are solved now. >> Time to do an official Dev2! ;-) >> > It is working perfectly (4 e

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi all > On May 7, 2020 7:46 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > My local Windows build was successful. All issues with language files are > solved now. > Time to do an official Dev2! ;-) > It is working perfectly (4 ever) ;) Any chance you (Jim) can share a regular test build of b

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Jim, Am 04.05.20 um 14:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS >>> available at >>> >>> o http://home.

Re: macOS and AOO42X

> On May 4, 2020, at 1:49 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > > On 5/4/2020 1:27 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 04.05.20 um 19:16 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> On 5/4/2020 11:40 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Keith, Hi Matthias Comments in line Am 04.05.20 um 17:30 schrieb Keith N. McKenna

Re: macOS and AOO42X

On 5/4/2020 1:27 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 04.05.20 um 19:16 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> On 5/4/2020 11:40 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Keith, >>> Hi Matthias Comments in line >>> Am 04.05.20 um 17:30 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: On 5/4/2020 9:33 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Jim, >

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Just installed the linux 64 bit, en-US on my machine. All good so far with just few documents. Onto to Calc later. Regards, Kay On 5/4/20 5:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Jim, Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: OK, so I have a

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 04.05.20 um 19:16 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: On 5/4/2020 11:40 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Keith, Hi Matthias Comments in line Am 04.05.20 um 17:30 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: On 5/4/2020 9:33 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Jim, Am 04.05.20 um 14:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: On May 3, 2020, at

Re: macOS and AOO42X

On 5/4/2020 11:40 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Keith, > Hi Matthias Comments in line > Am 04.05.20 um 17:30 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> On 5/4/2020 9:33 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Am 04.05.20 um 14:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Keith, Am 04.05.20 um 17:30 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On 5/4/2020 9:33 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 04.05.20 um 14:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Jim, Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Re: macOS and AOO42X

On 5/4/2020 9:33 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Am 04.05.20 um 14:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> >>> On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hello >> Yep, I think a tag makes the most sense... I'll wait a bit for people to >> chime in. > > Great! > As I already wrote, the French language file needs to be fixed, we are > working on it... French and Oromoo are fine now. I will do the *.sdf files tomorrow aftr the backup next night. >

Re: macOS and AOO42X

I am OK with the plan. Am 04.05.20 um 14:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Jim, Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS available at o http://home.apache.org/~

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Jim, Am 04.05.20 um 14:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS >>> available at >>> >>> o http://home.

Re: macOS and AOO42X

> On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS >> available at >> >> o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ >> >> These are of HEAD of AOO

AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Hi Mechtilde, Jim, @Mechtilde: French help seems to make some problems (spaces in XML tags). We must check that again. @Jim: I would like to do a complete dev build on Windows to see if all languages are OK. Regards,    Matthias Am 03.05.20 um 22:02 schrieb Mechtilde: > +1 > > Am 03.05.20 um 1

Re: macOS and AOO42X

+1 Am 03.05.20 um 19:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS >> available at >> >>o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ >> >> These are of HEAD of AOO42X and were b

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Jim, Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS > available at > >o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > > These are of HEAD of AOO42X and were built as developer releases... these are > not the "official"

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Marcus, Am 03.05.20 um 19:39 schrieb Marcus: > Am 03.05.20 um 12:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Marcus, >> >> Am 29.04.20 um 01:04 schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 29.04.20 um 00:56 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 29.04.20 um 00:48 schrieb Marcus: > Am 28.04.20 um 23:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 03.05.20 um 12:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Marcus, Am 29.04.20 um 01:04 schrieb Marcus: Am 29.04.20 um 00:56 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 29.04.20 um 00:48 schrieb Marcus: Am 28.04.20 um 23:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 28.04.20 um 23:33 schrieb Pedro Lino: Any chance the Dev2 can inc

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Marcus, Am 29.04.20 um 01:04 schrieb Marcus: > Am 29.04.20 um 00:56 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 29.04.20 um 00:48 schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 28.04.20 um 23:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 28.04.20 um 23:33 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Window

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Matthias > On April 30, 2020 6:51 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Just for clarification: > >> There are a lot of little things (double spaces, wrong icons in help, > >> etc.) in the source code that we have to fix. > >> From time to time Mechtilde creates a new language template (en-US) and >

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Jim, Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS > available at > >o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > > These are of HEAD of AOO42X and were built as developer releases... these are > not the "official"

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi, Am 30.04.20 um 19:39 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > >> Just for clarification: >> There are a lot of little things (double spaces, wrong icons in help, >> etc.) in the source code that we have to fix. >> From time to time Mechtilde creates a new language template (en-US) and >> imports it

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Matthias > Just for clarification: > There are a lot of little things (double spaces, wrong icons in help, > etc.) in the source code that we have to fix. > From time to time Mechtilde creates a new language template (en-US) and > imports it in Pootle. This results in those strings that have to

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Pedro, Am 30.04.20 um 00:51 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias, all > >> Let's wait for updated translations... I just posted a message on L10N@. > Translation update in progress ;) Thanks! Just for clarification: There are a lot of little things (double spaces, wrong icons in help, etc.) in t

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Matthias, all > Let's wait for updated translations... I just posted a message on L10N@. Translation update in progress ;) > BTW: Did we ever solve the "problem" with missing desktop integration on > Linux dev builds? Apparentely not. There are no links anywhere. The only way to run it is to

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Should of put this in one email SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=kde ./soffice actually makes it a bit more pronounced. SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gtk ./soffice runs as if the SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN was not set on the command line. On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:28 PM Drew Jensen wrote: > Also if I start it with > SAL_USE_VCLPLU

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Also if I start it with SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen ./soffice All the menu problems are gone. On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:05 PM Drew Jensen wrote: > Just this one - nor did I have this problem with that 4.5 build from a > while back - same desktop setup then also. > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 5:52 PM Mat

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Just this one - nor did I have this problem with that 4.5 build from a while back - same desktop setup then also. On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 5:52 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Drew, > > Am 29.04.20 um 22:39 schrieb Drew Jensen: > > Howdy, > > > > I fired up the binary for Linux under Ubuntu 18.04

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Drew, Am 29.04.20 um 22:39 schrieb Drew Jensen: > Howdy, > > I fired up the binary for Linux under Ubuntu 18.04 (KDE/Plasma) > Having an issue with menus. > For most of them, start center and module top level menus, there is an odd > delay when they open where the frame for the menu is drawn an

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Howdy, I fired up the binary for Linux under Ubuntu 18.04 (KDE/Plasma) Having an issue with menus. For most of them, start center and module top level menus, there is an odd delay when they open where the frame for the menu is drawn and filled with garbage for a second or so and then the menu item

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Jim, Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS > available at > >o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > > These are of HEAD of AOO42X and were built as developer releases... these are > not the "official"

Re: macOS and AOO42X

OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS available at o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ These are of HEAD of AOO42X and were built as developer releases... these are not the "official" Dev2m2 releases however, although they are in a directory that i

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Jim, Am 28.04.20 um 21:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > macOS builds for a handful of langs available at: > > o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ That's great! Unfortunately I have no mac to test with... I have now completed a full Dev-Build (46 languages) for Windows without problems. H

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 29.04.20 um 00:56 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 29.04.20 um 00:48 schrieb Marcus: Am 28.04.20 um 23:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 28.04.20 um 23:33 schrieb Pedro Lino: Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? No, this costs real money and will only be used for releases.

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Marcus, Am 29.04.20 um 00:48 schrieb Marcus: > Am 28.04.20 um 23:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 28.04.20 um 23:33 schrieb Pedro Lino: >>> Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? >> No, this costs real money and will only be used for releases. > I assume at l

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 28.04.20 um 23:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 28.04.20 um 23:33 schrieb Pedro Lino: Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? No, this costs real money and will only be used for releases. I assume at least the RC will be certified? Yes, it costs money but it needs to be

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 28.04.20 um 23:33 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias, all > > Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? No, this costs real money and will only be used for releases. >>> I assume at least the RC will be certified? >>> Yes, it costs money but it needs to be verified a

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Matthias, all > >>> Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? > >> No, this costs real money and will only be used for releases. > > I assume at least the RC will be certified? > > Yes, it costs money but it needs to be verified at some point before the > > first official

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 28.04.20 um 21:51 schrieb Pedro Lino: >>> Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? >> No, this costs real money and will only be used for releases. > I assume at least the RC will be certified? > Yes, it costs money but it needs to be verified at some point before the > fi

Re: macOS and AOO42X

> > Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? > > No, this costs real money and will only be used for releases. I assume at least the RC will be certified? Yes, it costs money but it needs to be verified at some point before the first official release. > Any chance to bri

Re: macOS and AOO42X

macOS builds for a handful of langs available at: o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > On Apr 28, 2020, at 10:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Just a FYI that I'm doing a quick test-build of HEAD AOO42X for macOS > > ---

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Am 28.04.20 um 21:09 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> What do you think about a Dev2? > +1 > > Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? No, this costs real money and will only be used for releases. Any chance to bring the Portuguese translation to 100% ;-) Matthias > > Regards, > Ped

Re: macOS and AOO42X

> What do you think about a Dev2? +1 Any chance the Dev2 can include certification for Windows OS? Regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoff

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hi Mechtilde, Am 28.04.20 um 17:10 schrieb Mechtilde: > Hello > > can you send the list of all Languages we will have in DEV2, then we can > ccommit the recent translation Including the 5 new languages that should be: ast bg ca ca-XR ca-XV cs da de el en-GB en-US es et eu fi fr gd gl he hi hu hy

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Hello can you send the list of all Languages we will have in DEV2, then we can ccommit the recent translation Regards Mechtilde Am 28.04.20 um 16:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > If the builds look good, ++1 for a Dev2 for all platforms > >> On Apr 28, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote:

Re: macOS and AOO42X

D'Accord! We would still need some time for the translators to complete their language and to commit the SDFs to source... Armenian (hy), Kabyle (kab), Oromo (om), Ukrainian (uk) and Estonian (et) would be my proposal to add for Dev2 (and 4.2.0 Release). Matthias Am 28.04.20 um 16:47 schrieb Ji

Re: macOS and AOO42X

If the builds look good, ++1 for a Dev2 for all platforms > On Apr 28, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Great! > > What do you think about a Dev2? > > Although the release blocker aren't fixed yet, a lot of changes are in > since Dev1 and I'd like to have 5 new languages added.

Re: macOS and AOO42X

Great! What do you think about a Dev2? Although the release blocker aren't fixed yet, a lot of changes are in since Dev1 and I'd like to have 5 new languages added. Regards,    Matthias Am 28.04.20 um 16:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Just a FYI that I'm doing a quick test-build of HEAD AOO42X fo

macOS and AOO42X

Just a FYI that I'm doing a quick test-build of HEAD AOO42X for macOS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org