- Messaggio originale -
> Da: Dave Fisher
...
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
>> Hello;
>>
>>
>> - Messaggio originale -
>>> Da: Jürgen Schmidt
>>
If we are distributing code there it is our responsibility.
I am af
On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello;
>
>
> - Messaggio originale -
>> Da: Jürgen Schmidt
>
>>>
>>> If we are distributing code there it is our responsibility.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am afraid there are also tarballs that deserve special consideration.
>>> I recall we
Hello;
- Messaggio originale -
> Da: Jürgen Schmidt
>>
>> If we are distributing code there it is our responsibility.
>>
>>
>> I am afraid there are also tarballs that deserve special consideration.
>> I recall we were carrying a GPL'd slovenian dictionary (not sure if I
> final
On 1/22/13 11:58 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> - Messaggio originale -
>
>> Da: Andrea Pescetti
>
>>
>> Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>> It would be good to tun a RAT scan over the website. We have not done
>>> anything to clean the content licensewise and we probably carry
>>> copyleft content,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> - Messaggio originale -
>
>> Da: Andrea Pescetti
>
>>
>> Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>> It would be good to tun a RAT scan over the website. We have not done
>>> anything to clean the content licensewise and we probably carry
>>> copylef
- Messaggio originale -
> Da: Andrea Pescetti
>
> Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>> It would be good to tun a RAT scan over the website. We have not done
>> anything to clean the content licensewise and we probably carry
>> copyleft content, including code, there!
>
> The website contains gig
On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>> It would be good to tun a RAT scan over the website. We have not done
>> anything to clean the content licensewise and we probably carry
>> copyleft content, including code, there!
>
> The website contains gigabytes o
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
It would be good to tun a RAT scan over the website. We have not done
anything to clean the content licensewise and we probably carry
copyleft content, including code, there!
The website contains gigabytes of materials for which we are probably
unable to trace detailed his
Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
I volunteer to run a RAT scan on the trunk
every two weeks and remove any IBM headers that are found there. So
we'll never be more then two weeks behind.
Yes, I think that allows for any committer to scratch an itch.
OK, great t
Somewhat off-topic, ma non troppo ...
It would be good to tun a RAT scan over the website. We have not done anything
to clean the content licensewise and we probably carry copyleft content,
including code, there!
Pedro.
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013 um 04:41 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2013,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Since this has com
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you all to a recent
thr
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you all to a recent
>>> thread on the legal-discuss list:
>>>
>>> http://mail-archiv
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you all to a recent
>> thread on the legal-discuss list:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201301.mbox/browse
On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you all to a recent
> thread on the legal-discuss list:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201301.mbox/browser
>
> If you are not familiar with the SGA form, you can se
On 01/21/2013 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you all to a recent
thread on the legal-discuss list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201301.mbox/browser
If you are not familiar with the SGA form, you can see it here:
http
19 matches
Mail list logo
