On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > > ----- Messaggio originale ----- >> Da: Jürgen Schmidt > >>> >>> If we are distributing code there it is our responsibility. >>> >>> >>> I am afraid there are also tarballs that deserve special consideration. >>> I recall we were carrying a GPL'd slovenian dictionary (not sure if I >> finally >>> got rid of it). Some content like the SDK should be verified for licensing >>> content and updated. >> >> what do you mean with SDK? Our OpenOffice SDK is part of the normal >> source tree and doesn't contain anything critical. >> > > I just looked and it appears we are pointing to the latest source indeed. > > I was afraid that there might be pages pointing to older releases > > http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sdk/ > > > I cleaned out older versions of dmake and a GPL'd dictionary that we were > carrying but without an audit we have no certainty about what may be left. > > And no, I don't have time to hunt for specific cases so that's the reason why > I am suggesting a rat scan. There's no hurry though, just something to > consider for a TODO list.
I think that rather than a RAT scan, a checkout of the web tree plus find/greps would uncover issues. Do you have search strings (other than GPL) to suggest? Regards, Dave > > Pedro.
