Pedro Giffuni wrote:
It would be good to tun a RAT scan over the website. We have not done
anything to clean the content licensewise and we probably carry
copyleft content, including code, there!
The website contains gigabytes of materials for which we are probably
unable to trace detailed history and licensing, since they come from
multiple CVS repositories, then lost and migrated to multiple SVN
repositories, then lost and migrated to the current tree.
So a RAT scan wouldn't probably yield anything actionable.
The only thing we know for sure is that all those materials were
contributed to be put on the openoffice.org website and that we are
continuing to keep them online. Even if there is copyleft content or
code I believe it will be fine so long as we don't put it in a release
(and it won't happen that some site contents go into a release without a
thorough check).
Regards,
Andrea.
