On 12/04/2020 Peter Kovacs wrote:
I feel attacked by your negativeness and I feel I have to defend myself for my
action.
The main topic in this discussion is about "renaming something that is
not quite right but that has been the same for many years".
This is always a complex discussion, an
Am 12.04.20 um 20:33 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 7:40 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [OT]Re: Nameing in Calc
Am 12.04.20 um 12:56 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 7:40 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: [OT]Re: Nameing in Calc
>
>
> Am 12.04.20 um 12:56 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> >
> >
> >>
Am 12.04.20 um 12:56 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 11:24 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: Nameing in Calc
Can you please take a moment and think on the content and
said, please
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 11:24 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RE: Nameing in Calc
>
> Can you please take a moment and think on the content and
> said, please?
>
2020/04/11 20:25:13, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 10:49 PM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Nameing in Calc
> >
> > Am 10.04.20 u
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 10:49 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Nameing in Calc
>
> Am 10.04.20 um 15:35 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> > I hope you are not seriously conside
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 1:25 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Nameing in Calc
> > I would disagree with Pedro's assertion that "developers
> don&#
Am 10.04.20 um 15:35 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I hope you are not seriously considering changing names that have been
the same as long as I can remember (well, maybe not quite back to
Visicalc, the first spread sheet I used).
right, there is absolute no need to change this.
Just a kind of no
Am 10.04.20 um 13:02 schrieb Dave:
My response is in-line with your original post.
On 10/04/2020 10:02, Peter Kovacs wrote:
I do some user help stuff on Facebook, and learn by that more about
using OpenOffice. (I do not have much Office needs in my private live.)
However there is in Calc the o
Despite I am irritated by numbers, I am not proposing a change.
Naming is difficult and largely depends on background.
Am 10.04.20 um 15:35 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I hope you are not seriously considering changing names that have been
the same as long as I can remember (well, maybe not quite
Thanks.
On 4/10/2020 6:52 AM, BMCS wrote:
NO. I am not proposing or considering anything of the kind. I was simply
replying to a question that was raised.
My post said *_IF_* we were looking for an alternative name, NOT that we
should be changing anything.
BTW. Congratulations on your election.
NO. I am not proposing or considering anything of the kind. I was simply
replying to a question that was raised.
My post said *_IF_* we were looking for an alternative name, NOT that we
should be changing anything.
BTW. Congratulations on your election.
Regards
Dave
On 10/04/2020 14:35, Patricia
I hope you are not seriously considering changing names that have been
the same as long as I can remember (well, maybe not quite back to
Visicalc, the first spread sheet I used).
On 4/10/2020 6:03 AM, BMCS wrote:
On 10/04/2020 13:03, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Am 10.04.20 um 13:02 schrieb Dave:
M
On 10/04/2020 13:03, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Am 10.04.20 um 13:02 schrieb Dave:
>> My response is in-line with your original post.
>>
>> On 10/04/2020 10:02, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>> Does anyone remeber the thinking behind this or has it been always like
>>> this and I just never knew.
>> To the be
Am 10.04.20 um 13:02 schrieb Dave:
My response is in-line with your original post.
On 10/04/2020 10:02, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Does anyone remeber the thinking behind this or has it been always like
this and I just never knew.
To the best of my recollection it has been this way since Sun open
s
Hi,
That is one of the problems with OpenOffice (and many other programs): the
developers don't actually use it and the users are not developers...
Long ago I used to be developer (DBMS, Paradox), since then I have been
trying to develop my user-behaviour. ;‑)
But take a look at AOO Base. In any
Hi Dave,
Am 10.04.20 um 13:02 schrieb Dave:
> My response is in-line with your original post.
>
> On 10/04/2020 10:02, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> I do some user help stuff on Facebook, and learn by that more about
>> using OpenOffice. (I do not have much Office needs in my private live.)
>>
>> However
My response is in-line with your original post.
On 10/04/2020 10:02, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I do some user help stuff on Facebook, and learn by that more about
> using OpenOffice. (I do not have much Office needs in my private live.)
>
> However there is in Calc the option to Format a cell. For in
Am 10.04.20 um 11:24 schrieb Pedro Lino:
Hi Peter
I do some user help stuff on Facebook, and learn by that more about
using OpenOffice. (I do not have much Office needs in my private live.)
That is one of the problems with OpenOffice (and many other programs): the
developers don't actually us
Hi Peter
> I do some user help stuff on Facebook, and learn by that more about
> using OpenOffice. (I do not have much Office needs in my private live.)
That is one of the problems with OpenOffice (and many other programs): the
developers don't actually use it and the users are not developers..
21 matches
Mail list logo
