On 03/12/2013 Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
What I would further like to do is reach out to my journalist
contacts of yore
Sure, that would be appreciated. You needn't have any formal appointment
from the project in order to approach journalists and provide them with
up-do-date, accurate informat
On 12/3/13 3:56 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 03-Dec-2013, at 09:14, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
>> wrote:
>>> On 2 December 2013 13:24, Rob Weir wrote:
Of course, this is not to blame Ohloh. The fault is not in their
service. The
On 03-Dec-2013, at 09:14, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
> wrote:
>> On 2 December 2013 13:24, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> Of course, this is not to blame Ohloh. The fault is not in their
>>> service. The fault lies with those who take such numbers and do false
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
wrote:
> On 2 December 2013 13:24, Rob Weir wrote:
>> Of course, this is not to blame Ohloh. The fault is not in their
>> service. The fault lies with those who take such numbers and do false
>> comparisons. This is intellectually dishonest an
On 02.12.2013 19:24, Rob Weir wrote:
You've probably seen various social media posts, blogs, articles,
etc., purporting to compare AOO and LO via commit statistics. If you
poke a little you see that these are almost always derived from Ohloh.
You can see our numbers here:
https://www.ohloh.ne
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Top posting.
> Thanks for this explanation!
> It will indeed help to temper some of the claims about these numbers.
>
> Hagar
>
Indeed, thank you! Who knew?
>
>
> Le 02/12/2013 19:24, Rob Weir a écrit :
>
>
> You've probably seen various s
On 2 December 2013 13:24, Rob Weir wrote:
> Of course, this is not to blame Ohloh. The fault is not in their
> service. The fault lies with those who take such numbers and do false
> comparisons. This is intellectually dishonest and I think we should
> point this out wherever we see it.
>
> Reg
Top posting.
Thanks for this explanation!
It will indeed help to temper some of the claims about these numbers.
Hagar
Le 02/12/2013 19:24, Rob Weir a écrit :
You've probably seen various social media posts, blogs, articles,
etc., purporting to compare AOO and LO via commit statistics. If you
You've probably seen various social media posts, blogs, articles,
etc., purporting to compare AOO and LO via commit statistics. If you
poke a little you see that these are almost always derived from Ohloh.
You can see our numbers here:
https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice
It is important to keep
