On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <lsuarezpo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 December 2013 13:24, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: >> Of course, this is not to blame Ohloh. The fault is not in their >> service. The fault lies with those who take such numbers and do false >> comparisons. This is intellectually dishonest and I think we should >> point this out wherever we see it. >> >> Regards, >> >> -Rob > > Rob, would you object if I quoted your post in toto on my blog, > ooo-speak.blogspot.com?
No objection. I'm also thinking of fortifying this page, where we link to the Ohloh stats: http://www.openoffice.org/stats/ We should probably be more specific with the caveats there. -Rob > cheers, > Louis > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
