Due to discussion, these changes will not be made.
On 12/23/2015 02:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> I'm looking at the latest version of the Third Party Licensing
> Policy for the ASF at:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>
> Here it spells out which licenses are acceptable for use in ASF
>
On 12/29/2015 06:33 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk
>> [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015
>> 10:00 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [LAZY
>> CONSENSUS] Changes to local "code use&quo
er 29, 2015 10:00
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Changes to local "code use" wording
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 12/29/2015 09:05 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>> The TL;DR:
>>>
>>> Yes, the license page describe
> -Original Message-
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:00
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Changes to local "code use" wording
>
>
>
> On 12/29/2015 09:05 AM, De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/12/2015 18:00, Kay Schenk wrote:
> In other words, if an author/developer licenses code with
> a particular license, is it not the intention of that developer to
> have the the product used in accordance with the license? And, if
> that is the c
on to this sort of thing that Project Management
> Committees are accountable for, with assistance of the
> legal-discuss and other lists when needed.
>
> - Dennis
>
>> -Original Message----- From: Kay Schenk
>> [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, D
0:04
> To: OOo Apache
> Subject: Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Changes to local "code use" wording
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
>
> > Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> >> OK, I will look for something like this, or please reply to thi
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> OK, I will look for something like this, or please reply to this
>> thread if you find something.
>>
>
> I've found it mentioned here, even though this is not a policy page:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/policie
Kay Schenk wrote:
OK, I will look for something like this, or please reply to this
thread if you find something.
I've found it mentioned here, even though this is not a policy page:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/privacy.html
"The ASF only accepts voluntary contributions of software
On 12/23/2015 04:13 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html ...
>> This document does not mention obtaining
>> permission from an author or entity
>
> It doesn't, since it only discusses the legal point of view. On the
> policy side, instead, t
Kay Schenk wrote:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html ...
This document does not mention obtaining
permission from an author or entity
It doesn't, since it only discusses the legal point of view. On the
policy side, instead, the Foundation (not only OpenOffice) requests that
code is vol
I'm looking at the latest version of the Third Party Licensing
Policy for the ASF at:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
Here it spells out which licenses are acceptable for use in ASF
products, and which, I am assuming can be used "as is" with proper
attribution where required. This docume
12 matches
Mail list logo
