On 12/23/2015 04:13 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html ...
>> This document does not mention obtaining
>> permission from an author or entity
> 
> It doesn't, since it only discusses the legal point of view. On the
> policy side, instead, the Foundation (not only OpenOffice) requests
> that code is voluntarily contributed.

I had thought since the "legal" page might be new, that once upon a
time explicit permission was needed but perhaps now it wasn't.

> 
> So the OpenOffice page is correct: in principle, Apache will not use
> code that is not voluntarily contributed. In practice, I believe we
> don't have (and for sure we don't need!) a formal process to ensure
> this. It is an ethical guideline peculiar to the Apache Software
> Foundation.
> 
> So the OpenOffice page should not be changed, but maybe it can be
> enriched with a link to an existing page that explains the above.

OK, I will look for something like this, or please reply to this
thread if you find something.

> 
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------
MzK

“I appreciate failure. Failure means that an
 attempt was made,  and a lesson can be learned.
 As long as we’re alive after the effort,
 there is a chance for success the next time around.”
             -- George Tekai, "Oh Myyy!"


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to