On 05/04/15 08:57, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Sure, if a project is in trouble, then that needs to be reported, but there
> are ways of doing so.
From several perspectives, the AOO project has been in trouble since
_before_ it entered incubation.
At this point, the most diplomatic thing is to say
> On 05 Apr 2015, at 07:24, jan i wrote:
>
> HI.
>
> I am starting a new thread where we can hopefully concentrate on making
> a final board report.
>
Thanks.
> Just to sum up, I have replaced the original report in the board agenda,
> with
> a dummy report. The original board report sits un
On 04/05/2015 11:35 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Wow, it sounds so depressive, I would really want to sound it more
> optimistic as more matter of fact. I think for a report is way too
> emotional.
>
> Just list what is being done (or not), is it still on planning stage, and
> what it's being
Driss has asked for review:
Issue 95167: XIRR() function gives Err:502
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=95167
Attachment 84634: New patch for the financial.cxx
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84634&action=edit
Driss has canceled Driss 's
request for review:
Issue 95167: XIRR() function gives Err:502
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=95167
Attachment 84632: Patch for finanical.cxx
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84632&action=edit
-
Hi Gavin,
2015-04-05 10:57 GMT+02:00 Gavin McDonald :
>
> > On 5 Apr 2015, at 8:07 am, Guy Waterval wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jan,
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > 2015-04-05 8:20 GMT+02:00 jan i :
> >
> >> On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
> >>>
> felt th
Hallo Regina,
I am using gcc compiler. I have tested the code under linux and has worked.
Now I will test the code using ::rtl::math::isNan and ::rtl::math::isInf
(But under Ubuntu) and upload new patch.
regards
Driss
2015-04-05 20:07 GMT+02:00 Regina Henschel :
> Hi,
>
> bugzi...@apache.org sc
Wow, it sounds so depressive, I would really want to sound it more
optimistic as more matter of fact. I think for a report is way too
emotional.
Just list what is being done (or not), is it still on planning stage, and
what it's being done to get it off planning stage into development or
execution
Hi,
bugzi...@apache.org schrieb:
Driss has asked for review:
Issue 95167: XIRR() function gives Err:502
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=95167
Attachment 84632: Patch for finanical.cxx
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84632&action=edit
It doesn't build with MSVC 9.0 Expr
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 11:04:57 -0400
Joseph Gardner wrote:
> I was made to signup with ms mail system to communicate with you and
> that doesn't work . I hope this gets to you because I can't even
> complain to ms to have them fix the problem using gmail which is the
> only mail that seems to work.
I was made to signup with ms mail system to communicate with you and
that doesn't work . I hope this gets to you because I can't even
complain to ms to have them fix the problem using gmail which is the
only mail that seems to work.
Here's my problem with Openoffice: when I try to add extensions
Peter Junge wrote:
it was a pleasure meeting you at the Office Apps BoF in Beijing.
Although we were a small group we certainly had an interesting
discussion. Thanks again for having organized the event.
...and be sure that I will ask you to consider writing a blog post!
Really, https://blogs.
Ariel Constenla-Haile has granted review:
Issue 81637: AOO filepicker: Replace column header "Title" by "Name"
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=81637
Attachment 84633: patch for fileview
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84633&action=edit
--- Comment #11 from Ariel Constenl
Driss has asked for review:
Issue 81637: AOO filepicker: Replace column header "Title" by "Name"
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=81637
Attachment 84633: patch for fileview
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84633&action=edit
---
Driss has asked for review:
Issue 95167: XIRR() function gives Err:502
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=95167
Attachment 84632: Patch for finanical.cxx
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84632&action=edit
-
To
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> So here is the original report as submitted to the board, and I annotate
> inline the changes
> I suggested be considered.
>
> As originally stated, please feel free to incorporate any or none of the
> changes at your leisure
Hello Ariel,
> --html will give you something like this:
>
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/log/unxlngx6.pro.build.html
thanks, will try again ;-)
> I saw these errors but since I am not on Windows, I didn't know how to
> interpret them. Are you saying that AOO will n
HI.
I am starting a new thread where we can hopefully concentrate on making
a final board report.
Just to sum up, I have replaced the original report in the board agenda,
with
a dummy report. The original board report sits untouched in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+Ap
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Gavin McDonald
wrote:
>
> I suggested (that is the word suggested; and yes it was me!) that some
> sentences be
> reworded slightly - to say the same thing, but in a more positive light,
> in such a way
> as that it might actually encourage more folks to step forw
On 5 April 2015 at 12:35, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 11:49:44AM +0200, jan i wrote:
> >...
> > I have never thought or said this was about my person, it has nothing to
> do
> > with my person.
> > It has to do with the free will of a community versus discussions on
> > private li
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 11:49:44AM +0200, jan i wrote:
>...
> I have never thought or said this was about my person, it has nothing to do
> with my person.
> It has to do with the free will of a community versus discussions on
> private list outside the reach of the community.
As the AOO VP, it is
On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 02:37:46AM +0200, jan i wrote:
> >...
> > Background is that after the report was submitted, a ASF Member (not
> board
> > member and not part of our community)
> > felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too ne
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 02:17:01AM +0100, Simon Phipps wrote:
>...
> The report should stand as-is rather than be voided by a private request
> that seems to fly in the face of the public evidence.
Agreed, Simon. Jan "voided" the report after feedback from (3) individuals,
speaking as such. The on
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 02:37:46AM +0200, jan i wrote:
>...
> Background is that after the report was submitted, a ASF Member (not board
> member and not part of our community)
> felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative and
> against the wishes of the community
"against
Dear Imacat,
it was a pleasure meeting you at the Office Apps BoF in Beijing.
Although we were a small group we certainly had an interesting
discussion. Thanks again for having organized the event.
Kindest regards
Peter
On 14/03/15 18:37, imacat wrote:
Dear Peter,
Peter Junge on 2015/03/14
On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> > On 5 Apr 2015, at 7:20 am, jan i > wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon > wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
> >>
> >>> felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative
> and
> >> against the wish
Hi Folks,
So here is the original report as submitted to the board, and I annotate inline
the changes
I suggested be considered.
As originally stated, please feel free to incorporate any or none of the
changes at your leisure -
I won’t be offended :)
The intent of my changes was to put a mo
> On 5 Apr 2015, at 7:20 am, jan i wrote:
>
> On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon wrote:
>
>> On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
>>
>>> felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative and
>> against the wishes of the community
>>
>> I'm going to suggest that said PMC Member
> On 5 Apr 2015, at 2:17 am, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> On 5 Apr 2015 02:05, "jan i" wrote:
>> I can
>> replace the report with a short note stating the I (as chair) have removed
>> it, because the community need more
>> time to discuss the content.
>>
>
> That seems crazy, given the long review
> On 5 Apr 2015, at 8:07 am, Guy Waterval wrote:
>
> Hi Jan,
> Hi all,
>
>
> 2015-04-05 8:20 GMT+02:00 jan i :
>
>> On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
>>>
felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative
>> and
>>> agai
I have now filed a new board report. I have done so, to give us time to
rethink
the report. I apologize for not having sought consensus on the new report,
but speed was essential, to stop a discussion on board@, I hope the
community
will support my action.
Just to avoid any misunderstanding, the P
Hi Jan,
Hi all,
2015-04-05 8:20 GMT+02:00 jan i :
> On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon wrote:
>
> > On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
> >
> > > felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative
> and
> > against the wishes of the community
> >
> > I'm going to suggest that said
32 matches
Mail list logo
