> On 5 Apr 2015, at 2:17 am, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > > On 5 Apr 2015 02:05, "jan i" <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> I can >> replace the report with a short note stating the I (as chair) have removed >> it, because the community need more >> time to discuss the content. >> > > That seems crazy, given the long review window and the absence of criticism > on this list. The report was openly discussed for longer than I recall any > other Board report. Any member claiming there was community opposition > should produce evidence to that effect.
Ok so nobody has said there was any community opposition at all. I thought that the report was worded negatively and suggested a few changes to give it a more positive flow that might help the project. > > The report should stand as-is rather than be voided by a private request > that seems to fly in the face of the public evidence. My suggestions were just that, and I made it clear they could be incorporated or ignored at leisure. I’m totally fine with whatever is decided. Gav… > > S. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
