Thanks for the catch John, the JIRA description looks good!
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:43 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Thanks John!
>
> Good catch!
>
> On 10/17/19 12:11 PM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
> > Awesome. Thanks John for fixing this!
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:07 PM John Roesler wrote
Thanks John!
Good catch!
On 10/17/19 12:11 PM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
> Awesome. Thanks John for fixing this!
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:07 PM John Roesler wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> While writing some new test cases for foreign key joins (as accepted
>> in KIP-213), I realized that there
Awesome. Thanks John for fixing this!
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:07 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> While writing some new test cases for foreign key joins (as accepted
> in KIP-213), I realized that there was an oversight in the review
> process: we only proposed to add join methods that
Hello all,
While writing some new test cases for foreign key joins (as accepted
in KIP-213), I realized that there was an oversight in the review
process: we only proposed to add join methods that take a Materialized
parameter.
This poses an unnecessary burden on users who don't _need_ to
materia
Done and done.
I will begin work on bringing the previous PR up to date with the KIP.
Thanks all
Adam
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:17 AM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hello Adam,
>
> Thank YOU for all the patience going through this process!
>
> Could you update the KIP pages (including the parent page
Hello Adam,
Thank YOU for all the patience going through this process!
Could you update the KIP pages (including the parent page) with the newest
status as well? Thanks.
Guozhang
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 6:12 PM Adam Bellemare
wrote:
> Thanks to everyone, including John, Guozhang, Matthias an
Thanks to everyone, including John, Guozhang, Matthias and Jan for all the help!
I do believe that makes 3 binding and 3 non-binding, vote passes.
Thanks folks
> On Mar 11, 2019, at 5:02 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for putting this together Adam and Jan!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
Thanks a lot for putting this together Adam and Jan!
+1 (binding)
-Matthias
On 2/15/19 11:27 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
> Hi Bill
>
> Now that you are a committer, does your vote add a +1 to binding? Can you
> recast it if you believe this is a sound decision? I am eager to finally
> finish
I think, he needs to re-cast his vote.
-Matthias
On 2/15/19 5:49 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Since Bill is now a committer, the vote is changed to 3 binding and 3
> non-binding (unless I am somehow mistaken - please let me know!). In this
> case, I believe the vote passes.
>
> Than
Hi Bill
Now that you are a committer, does your vote add a +1 to binding? Can you
recast it if you believe this is a sound decision? I am eager to finally finish
up this KIP that has been open so long.
Thanks
Adam
> On Feb 15, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> I think, he need
Hi all
Since Bill is now a committer, the vote is changed to 3 binding and 3
non-binding (unless I am somehow mistaken - please let me know!). In this case,
I believe the vote passes.
Thanks
Adam
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 7:28 PM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
>
> Bumping this vote because I don't wan
Bumping this vote because I don't want it to languish. It is very unlikely
to go into 2.2 at this point, but I would like to avoid resurrecting a dead
thread in 30 days time.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:07 PM Adam Bellemare
wrote:
> All good Matthias. If it doesn’t get in for 2.2 I’ll just do it f
All good Matthias. If it doesn’t get in for 2.2 I’ll just do it for the next
release.
Thanks
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> I'll try to review the KIP before the deadline, but as I am acting as
> release manager and also working on KIP-258, I cannot promise. Even i
I'll try to review the KIP before the deadline, but as I am acting as
release manager and also working on KIP-258, I cannot promise. Even if
we make the voting deadline, it might also be tight to review the PR, as
it seems to be big and complicated.
I'll try my very best to get it into 2.2...
-M
If I can get one more binding vote in here, I may be able to get this out
for the 2.2 release in February.
Currently at:
2 binding, 4 non-binding.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 2:41 PM Patrik Kleindl wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> I have followed the discussion too and think this feature will be very
+1 (non-binding)
I have followed the discussion too and think this feature will be very helpful.
Thanks Adam for staying on this.
Best regards
Patrik
> Am 13.01.2019 um 19:55 schrieb Paul Whalen :
>
> +1 non binding. I haven't contributed at all to discussion but have
> followed since Adam rein
+1 non binding. I haven't contributed at all to discussion but have
followed since Adam reinvigorated it a few months ago and am very excited
about it. It would be a huge help on the project I'm working on.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:05 AM Adam Bellemare
wrote:
> Thanks all -
>
> So far that's
Thanks all -
So far that's +2 Binding, +2 non-binding
If we get a few more votes I can likely get this out as part of the Kafka
2.2 release, as the KIP Freeze is Jan 24, 2019. The current PR I have could
be modified to match the PR in short order.
Adam
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:11 AM Damian Gu
+1 binding
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 16:57, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1 from me. Great job on the KIP.
>
> -Bill
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:35 AM John Roesler wrote:
>
> > It's a +1 (nonbinding) from me as well.
> >
> > Thanks for sticking with this, Adam!
> > -John
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at
+1 from me. Great job on the KIP.
-Bill
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:35 AM John Roesler wrote:
> It's a +1 (nonbinding) from me as well.
>
> Thanks for sticking with this, Adam!
> -John
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:22 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > Hello Adam,
> >
> > I'm +1 on the current propo
It's a +1 (nonbinding) from me as well.
Thanks for sticking with this, Adam!
-John
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:22 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hello Adam,
>
> I'm +1 on the current proposal, thanks!
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:13 AM Adam Bellemare
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > I woul
Hello Adam,
I'm +1 on the current proposal, thanks!
Guozhang
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:13 AM Adam Bellemare
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I would like to call a new vote on KIP-213. The design has changed
> substantially. Perhaps more importantly, the KIP and associated
> documentation has been greatly
Hi All
I would like to call a new vote on KIP-213. The design has changed
substantially. Perhaps more importantly, the KIP and associated
documentation has been greatly simplified. I know this KIP has been on the
mailing list for a long time, but the help from John Roesler and Guozhang
Wang have h
23 matches
Mail list logo
