Hi Bill Now that you are a committer, does your vote add a +1 to binding? Can you recast it if you believe this is a sound decision? I am eager to finally finish up this KIP that has been open so long.
Thanks Adam > On Feb 15, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > > I think, he needs to re-cast his vote. > > -Matthias > >> On 2/15/19 5:49 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Since Bill is now a committer, the vote is changed to 3 binding and 3 >> non-binding (unless I am somehow mistaken - please let me know!). In this >> case, I believe the vote passes. >> >> Thanks >> >> Adam >> >>> On Jan 24, 2019, at 7:28 PM, Adam Bellemare <adam.bellem...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Bumping this vote because I don't want it to languish. It is very unlikely >>> to go into 2.2 at this point, but I would like to avoid resurrecting a dead >>> thread in 30 days time. >>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:07 PM Adam Bellemare <adam.bellem...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> All good Matthias. If it doesn’t get in for 2.2 I’ll just do it for the >>>> next release. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'll try to review the KIP before the deadline, but as I am acting as >>>>> release manager and also working on KIP-258, I cannot promise. Even if >>>>> we make the voting deadline, it might also be tight to review the PR, as >>>>> it seems to be big and complicated. >>>>> >>>>> I'll try my very best to get it into 2.2... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/15/19 3:27 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote: >>>>>> If I can get one more binding vote in here, I may be able to get this out >>>>>> for the 2.2 release in February. >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently at: >>>>>> 2 binding, 4 non-binding. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 2:41 PM Patrik Kleindl <pklei...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> I have followed the discussion too and think this feature will be very >>>>>>> helpful. >>>>>>> Thanks Adam for staying on this. >>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>> Patrik >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 13.01.2019 um 19:55 schrieb Paul Whalen <pgwha...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 non binding. I haven't contributed at all to discussion but have >>>>>>>> followed since Adam reinvigorated it a few months ago and am very >>>>>>>> excited >>>>>>>> about it. It would be a huge help on the project I'm working on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:05 AM Adam Bellemare >>>>>>>> <adam.bellem...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks all - >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So far that's +2 Binding, +2 non-binding >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If we get a few more votes I can likely get this out as part of the >>>>>>> Kafka >>>>>>>>> 2.2 release, as the KIP Freeze is Jan 24, 2019. The current PR I have >>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>> be modified to match the PR in short order. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Adam >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:11 AM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 binding >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 16:57, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me. Great job on the KIP. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Bill >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:35 AM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's a +1 (nonbinding) from me as well. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for sticking with this, Adam! >>>>>>>>>>>> -John >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:22 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Adam, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm +1 on the current proposal, thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Guozhang >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:13 AM Adam Bellemare < >>>>>>>>>>> adam.bellem...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to call a new vote on KIP-213. The design has >>>>>>>>> changed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> substantially. Perhaps more importantly, the KIP and associated >>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation has been greatly simplified. I know this KIP has >>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list for a long time, but the help from John Roesler and >>>>>>>>>>>> Guozhang >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wang have helped put it into a much better state. I would >>>>>>>>>> appreciate >>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback or votes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-213+Support+non-key+joining+in+KTable >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adam Bellemare >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Guozhang >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >> >
