Hello Adam,

Thank YOU for all the patience going through this process!

Could you update the KIP pages (including the parent page) with the newest
status as well? Thanks.


Guozhang

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 6:12 PM Adam Bellemare <adam.bellem...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks to everyone, including John, Guozhang, Matthias and Jan for all the
> help!
>
> I do believe that makes 3 binding and 3 non-binding, vote passes.
>
> Thanks folks
>
> > On Mar 11, 2019, at 5:02 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks a lot for putting this together Adam and Jan!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >> On 2/15/19 11:27 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
> >> Hi Bill
> >>
> >> Now that you are a committer, does your vote add a +1 to binding? Can
> you recast it if you believe this is a sound decision? I am eager to
> finally finish up this KIP that has been open so long.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Adam
> >>
> >>> On Feb 15, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think, he needs to re-cast his vote.
> >>>
> >>> -Matthias
> >>>
> >>>> On 2/15/19 5:49 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
> >>>> Hi all
> >>>>
> >>>> Since Bill is now a committer, the vote is changed to 3 binding and 3
> non-binding (unless I am somehow mistaken - please let me know!). In this
> case, I believe the vote passes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Adam
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jan 24, 2019, at 7:28 PM, Adam Bellemare <
> adam.bellem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bumping this vote because I don't want it to languish. It is very
> unlikely to go into 2.2 at this point, but I would like to avoid
> resurrecting a dead thread in 30 days time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:07 PM Adam Bellemare <
> adam.bellem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> All good Matthias. If it doesn’t get in for 2.2 I’ll just do it for
> the next release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Matthias J. Sax <
> matth...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'll try to review the KIP before the deadline, but as I am acting
> as
> >>>>>>> release manager and also working on KIP-258, I cannot promise.
> Even if
> >>>>>>> we make the voting deadline, it might also be tight to review the
> PR, as
> >>>>>>> it seems to be big and complicated.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'll try my very best to get it into 2.2...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Matthias
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 1/15/19 3:27 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
> >>>>>>>> If I can get one more binding vote in here, I may be able to get
> this out
> >>>>>>>> for the 2.2 release in February.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Currently at:
> >>>>>>>> 2 binding, 4 non-binding.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 2:41 PM Patrik Kleindl <
> pklei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>> I have followed the discussion too and think this feature will
> be very
> >>>>>>>>> helpful.
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Adam for staying on this.
> >>>>>>>>> Best regards
> >>>>>>>>> Patrik
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am 13.01.2019 um 19:55 schrieb Paul Whalen <pgwha...@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +1 non binding.  I haven't contributed at all to discussion but
> have
> >>>>>>>>>> followed since Adam reinvigorated it a few months ago and am
> very excited
> >>>>>>>>>> about it.  It would be a huge help on the project I'm working
> on.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:05 AM Adam Bellemare <
> adam.bellem...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks all -
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So far that's +2 Binding, +2 non-binding
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If we get a few more votes I can likely get this out as part
> of the
> >>>>>>>>> Kafka
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.2 release, as the KIP Freeze is Jan 24, 2019. The current PR
> I have
> >>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>> be modified to match the PR in short order.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Adam
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:11 AM Damian Guy <
> damian....@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 16:57, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me.  Great job on the KIP.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Bill
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:35 AM John Roesler <
> j...@confluent.io>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a +1 (nonbinding) from me as well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for sticking with this, Adam!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -John
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:22 PM Guozhang Wang <
> wangg...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Adam,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm +1 on the current proposal, thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guozhang
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:13 AM Adam Bellemare <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> adam.bellem...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to call a new vote on KIP-213. The design has
> >>>>>>>>>>> changed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> substantially. Perhaps more importantly, the KIP and
> associated
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation has been greatly simplified. I know this
> KIP has
> >>>>>>>>>>> been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list for a long time, but the help from John
> Roesler and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guozhang
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wang have helped put it into a much better state. I would
> >>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback or votes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-213+Support+non-key+joining+in+KTable
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adam Bellemare
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to