Thanks to everyone, including John, Guozhang, Matthias and Jan for all the help!

I do believe that makes 3 binding and 3 non-binding, vote passes.

Thanks folks 

> On Mar 11, 2019, at 5:02 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote:
> 
> Thanks a lot for putting this together Adam and Jan!
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> 
> 
> -Matthias
> 
>> On 2/15/19 11:27 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
>> Hi Bill 
>> 
>> Now that you are a committer, does your vote add a +1 to binding? Can you 
>> recast it if you believe this is a sound decision? I am eager to finally 
>> finish up this KIP that has been open so long.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Adam 
>> 
>>> On Feb 15, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think, he needs to re-cast his vote.
>>> 
>>> -Matthias
>>> 
>>>> On 2/15/19 5:49 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
>>>> Hi all
>>>> 
>>>> Since Bill is now a committer, the vote is changed to 3 binding and 3 
>>>> non-binding (unless I am somehow mistaken - please let me know!). In this 
>>>> case, I believe the vote passes.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> Adam 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 24, 2019, at 7:28 PM, Adam Bellemare <adam.bellem...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bumping this vote because I don't want it to languish. It is very 
>>>>> unlikely to go into 2.2 at this point, but I would like to avoid 
>>>>> resurrecting a dead thread in 30 days time.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:07 PM Adam Bellemare 
>>>>>> <adam.bellem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> All good Matthias. If it doesn’t get in for 2.2 I’ll just do it for the 
>>>>>> next release. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'll try to review the KIP before the deadline, but as I am acting as
>>>>>>> release manager and also working on KIP-258, I cannot promise. Even if
>>>>>>> we make the voting deadline, it might also be tight to review the PR, as
>>>>>>> it seems to be big and complicated.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'll try my very best to get it into 2.2...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 1/15/19 3:27 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
>>>>>>>> If I can get one more binding vote in here, I may be able to get this 
>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>> for the 2.2 release in February.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Currently at:
>>>>>>>> 2 binding, 4 non-binding.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 2:41 PM Patrik Kleindl <pklei...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>> I have followed the discussion too and think this feature will be very
>>>>>>>>> helpful.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Adam for staying on this.
>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>> Patrik
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Am 13.01.2019 um 19:55 schrieb Paul Whalen <pgwha...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1 non binding.  I haven't contributed at all to discussion but have
>>>>>>>>>> followed since Adam reinvigorated it a few months ago and am very 
>>>>>>>>>> excited
>>>>>>>>>> about it.  It would be a huge help on the project I'm working on.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:05 AM Adam Bellemare 
>>>>>>>>>> <adam.bellem...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks all -
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> So far that's +2 Binding, +2 non-binding
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If we get a few more votes I can likely get this out as part of the
>>>>>>>>> Kafka
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.2 release, as the KIP Freeze is Jan 24, 2019. The current PR I 
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>> be modified to match the PR in short order.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Adam
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:11 AM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 16:57, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me.  Great job on the KIP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Bill
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:35 AM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a +1 (nonbinding) from me as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for sticking with this, Adam!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -John
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:22 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Adam,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm +1 on the current proposal, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guozhang
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:13 AM Adam Bellemare <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> adam.bellem...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to call a new vote on KIP-213. The design has
>>>>>>>>>>> changed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> substantially. Perhaps more importantly, the KIP and associated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation has been greatly simplified. I know this KIP has
>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list for a long time, but the help from John Roesler 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guozhang
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wang have helped put it into a much better state. I would
>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback or votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-213+Support+non-key+joining+in+KTable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adam Bellemare
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Guozhang
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to