Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Thanks Renjie for the great work! Happy holidays! On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 1:59 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > Thanks Renjie for making this happen. The new page looks great! Hopefully > we can keep it up-to-date :-) > Yufei > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 10:07 AM Kevin Liu wrote: > >> Thanks for driving

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Thanks Renjie for making this happen. The new page looks great! Hopefully we can keep it up-to-date :-) Yufei On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 10:07 AM Kevin Liu wrote: > Thanks for driving this Renjie! The new page looks great and we'll refine > it more over time :) > > Happy holidays! > > Best, > Kevi

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Thanks for driving this Renjie! The new page looks great and we'll refine it more over time :) Happy holidays! Best, Kevin Liu On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 7:52 PM Manu Zhang wrote: > Thanks Renjie for landing the page and others for the review! > > Merry Christmas! > > | > -+- >

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Thanks Renjie for landing the page and others for the review! Merry Christmas! | -+- A /=\ /\ /\___ _ __ _ __ ____ i/ O \i/ \/ \ / _ \| '__|| '__|\ \ / / /=\ / /\ /\ \| __/| | | |\ \/ /

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Hi: Thanks everyone for the review and discussion, we have status page landed: https://iceberg.apache.org/status/ On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:04 AM Renjie Liu wrote: > Hi: > Sorry for delay, here is the pr: > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11772 > > The status may be inaccurate, maintain

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Hi: Sorry for delay, here is the pr: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11772 The status may be inaccurate, maintainers of different libraries please help to review and comment on it. On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 3:12 AM Kevin Liu wrote: > Thanks, Renjie! Happy to review and help fill out the ma

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Thanks, Renjie! Happy to review and help fill out the matrix! :) Best, Kevin Liu On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:51 PM Renjie Liu wrote: > Hi: > > Thanks for everyone's comments. I think we reached agreement on the > design, and I'll send a pr for it. > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 1:13 AM Yufei Gu wr

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Hi: Thanks for everyone's comments. I think we reached agreement on the design, and I'll send a pr for it. On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 1:13 AM Yufei Gu wrote: > LGTM. Thanks Renjie! > Yufei > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:38 AM Renjie Liu > wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> > One minor suggestion: adding a ta

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

LGTM. Thanks Renjie! Yufei On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:38 AM Renjie Liu wrote: > Hi: > > > One minor suggestion: adding a table spec version label along with the > feature in the support matrix. That doesn't apply to REST spec though. > > Updated the doc, please take a look. > > > My only comment

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Hi: > One minor suggestion: adding a table spec version label along with the feature in the support matrix. That doesn't apply to REST spec though. Updated the doc, please take a look. > My only comment is probably to use versions instead of check marks, but all good :) In current approach we w

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Hi, I like the idea. My only comment is probably to use versions instead of check marks, but all good :) Thanks ! Regards JB On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 3:33 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > > Sounds like a great idea to me > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:58 AM Renjie Liu wrote: >> >> Hi: >> >> As iceberg

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Love the idea! On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 10:02 AM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1 looking forward to it. One minor suggestion: adding a table spec > version label along with the feature in the support matrix. That doesn't > apply to REST spec though. > > Yufei > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 9:31 AM Kevin Liu w

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

+1 looking forward to it. One minor suggestion: adding a table spec version label along with the feature in the support matrix. That doesn't apply to REST spec though. Yufei On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 9:31 AM Kevin Liu wrote: > Hi Renjie, > > I absolutely love this idea! I wanted to do something s

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Hi Renjie, I absolutely love this idea! I wanted to do something similar while working on the Pyiceberg roadmap. It would make sense to include this for all projects. Some benefits that I see, * Easily and quickly answer questions for "Is X supported in <> project?" * Roadmap for feature parity *

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a implementation status page for iceberg

Sounds like a great idea to me On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:58 AM Renjie Liu wrote: > Hi: > > As iceberg evolved to a multi-lang project, I would like to propose to > maintain a status page for iceberg. For more details, please refer to this > doc >