Thanks for driving this Renjie! The new page looks great and we'll refine it more over time :)
Happy holidays! Best, Kevin Liu On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 7:52 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Renjie for landing the page and others for the review! > > Merry Christmas! > > | > -+- > A > /=\ /\ /\ ___ _ __ _ __ __ __ > i/ O \i / \/ \ / _ \| '__|| '__|\ \ / / > /=====\ / /\ /\ \| __/| | | | \ \/ / > / i \ \ \ \/ / / \___/|_| |_| \ / > i/ O * O \i / / > /=========\ __ __ /_/ _ > / * * \ \ \/ / /\ /\ __ _ ____ | | > i/ O i O \i \ / __ / \/ \ / _` |/ ___\ |_| > /=============\ / \ |__| / /\ /\ \| (_| |\___ \ _ > / O i O \ /_/\_\ \ \ \/ / / \__,_|\____/ |_| > i/ * O O * \i > /=================\ > |___| > > > > Manu > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 10:52 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> Thanks everyone for the review and discussion, we have status page >> landed: https://iceberg.apache.org/status/ >> >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:04 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> Sorry for delay, here is the pr: >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11772 >>> >>> The status may be inaccurate, maintainers of different libraries please >>> help to review and comment on it. >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 3:12 AM Kevin Liu <kevin.jq....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks, Renjie! Happy to review and help fill out the matrix! :) >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Kevin Liu >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:51 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for everyone's comments. I think we reached agreement on the >>>>> design, and I'll send a pr for it. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 1:13 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> LGTM. Thanks Renjie! >>>>>> Yufei >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:38 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > One minor suggestion: adding a table spec version label along with >>>>>>> the feature in the support matrix. That doesn't apply to REST spec >>>>>>> though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Updated the doc, please take a look. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > My only comment is probably to use versions instead of check >>>>>>> marks, but all good :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In current approach we will write the version of each library in the >>>>>>> beginning of the page, which seems easier to maintain than per version >>>>>>> per >>>>>>> feature. What do you think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 5:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I like the idea. My only comment is probably to use versions instead >>>>>>>> of check marks, but all good :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 3:33 PM Russell Spitzer >>>>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Sounds like a great idea to me >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:58 AM Renjie Liu < >>>>>>>> liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Hi: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> As iceberg evolved to a multi-lang project, I would like to >>>>>>>> propose to maintain a status page for iceberg. For more details, please >>>>>>>> refer to this doc. Welcome to join the discussion and comment on it! >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
