+1 looking forward to it. One minor suggestion: adding a table spec version label along with the feature in the support matrix. That doesn't apply to REST spec though.
Yufei On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 9:31 AM Kevin Liu <kevin.jq....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Renjie, > > I absolutely love this idea! I wanted to do something similar while > working on the Pyiceberg roadmap. It would make sense to include this for > all projects. > > Some benefits that I see, > * Easily and quickly answer questions for "Is X supported in <> project?" > * Roadmap for feature parity > * Keep all the libraries in sync in terms of core features > * As we add features to one library, we can track support in other > libraries as well > > +1 to having it as a link in https://iceberg.apache.org/. I like that > Arrow use https://arrow.apache.org/docs/status.html > > Looking forward to making this happen! And happy to help in any way. > > Best, > Kevin Liu > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 6:33 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Sounds like a great idea to me >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:58 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> As iceberg evolved to a multi-lang project, I would like to propose to >>> maintain a status page for iceberg. For more details, please refer to this >>> doc >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sRsTatGQJJNiBiQZNUW4VwQDCV1e75BHM6cSPla4vBU/edit?usp=sharing>. >>> Welcome to join the discussion and comment on it! >>> >>> >>>
